Sunday, October 23, 2011
New Series 64: More history about the lies of the cabal / khazarians / holocaust et... from Journals 39 & 40 - - see links below:
http://phoenixmaterials.org/pdf/J039.pdf (Journal 39)
http://phoenixmaterials.org/pdf/J040.pdf (Journal 40)
10/18/11b from HATONN/jonur (ns64)
* * *
Continuing quote from VOLUME 2, PHOENIX JOURNAL #40, THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE THE HOLOCAUST.
… propaganda purposes. A study of the documents also reveals that Jewish witnesses who resented their deportation and internment in prison camps tended to greatly exaggerate the rigors of their condition, whereas other nationals interned for political reasons, such as those cited above, generally presented a more balanced picture. In many cases, prisoners such as Charlotte Bormann, whose experiences did not accord with the picture presented at Nuremberg, were not permitted to testify.
The orderly situation prevailing in the German concentration camps slowly broke down in the last fearful months of 1945. The Red Cross Report of 1948 explains that the saturation bombing by the Allies paralyzed the transport and communications system of the Reich, no food reached the camps, and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims, both in prison camps and among the civilian population of Germany. This terrible situation was compounded in the camps both by great overcrowding and the consequent outbreak of typhus epidemics. Overcrowding occurred as a result of prisoners from the eastern camps such as Auschwitz being evacuated westward before the Russian advance; columns of such exhausted people arrived at several German camps such as Belsen and Buchenwald, which had themselves reached a state of great hardship. Belsen camp near Bremen was in an especially chaotic condition in these months and Himmler’s physician, Felix Kersten, an anti-Nazi, explains that its unfortunate reputation as a “death camp” was due solely to the ferocity of the typhus epidemic which broke out there in March 1945 (MEMOIRS 1940-1945, London 1956). Undoubtedly these fearful conditions cost several thousand lives, and it is these conditions that are represented in the photographs of emaciated human beings and heaps of corpses which the propagandists delight in showing, claiming they are victims of “extermination”.
WHAT EXCUSE DO YOU HAVE FOR YOUR NATION WHO CONTINUES TO STARVE AND KILL BY DISEASE, THE PEOPLE OF IRAQ? YOU CONTINUE TO REFUSE TO ALLOW FOOD AND SUPPLIES INTO A NATION DYING OF STARVATION AND LACK OF FACILITIES TO SUSTAIN LIFE. HOW WILL YOU DEAL WITH THIS HISTORICALLY? OH YES, I FORGOT—YOU WILL MAKE IT ILLEGAL TO SPEAK OF IT! SO BE IT.
A surprisingly honest appraisal of the situation at Belsen in 1945 appeared in Purnell’s HISTORY OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR (Vol. 7, No. 15) by Dr. Russell Barton, now superintendent and consultant psychiatrist at Severalls Hospital, Essex, who spent one month at the camp as a medical student after the war. His account vividly illustrates the true causes of the mortality that occurred in such camps towards the war’s end, and how such extreme conditions came to prevail there. Dr. Barton explains that Brigadier Glyn Hughes, the British Medical Officer who took command of Belsen in 1945, “did not think there had been any atrocities in the camp” despite discipline and hard work. “Most people,” writes Dr. Barton, “attributed the conditions of the inmates to deliberate intention on the part of the Germans …. Inmates were eager to cite examples of brutality and neglect, and visiting journalists from different countries interpreted the situation according to the needs of propaganda at home.”
However, Dr. Barton makes it quite clear that the conditions of starvation and disease were unavoidable in the circumstances, and that they occurred only during the months of 1945. “From discussions with prisoners, it seemed that conditions in the camp were not too bad until late 1944. The huts were set among pine trees and each was provided with lavatories, wash basins, showers and stoves for heating.” The cause of food shortage is also explained. “German medical officers told me that it had been increasingly difficult to transport food to the camp for some months. Anything that moved on the autobahns was likely to be bombed …. I was surprised to find records, going back for two or three years, of large quantities of food cooked daily for distribution. At that time I became convinced, contrary to popular opinion, that there had never been a policy of deliberate starvation. This was confirmed by the large numbers of well-fed inmates. Why then were so many people suffering from malnutrition? … The major reasons for the state of Belsen were disease, gross overcrowding by central authority, lack of law and order within the huts, and inadequate supplies of food, water and drugs.” The lack of order, which led to riots over food distribution, was quelled by British Machine-gun fire and a display of force when British tanks and armored cars toured the camp.
Apart from the unavoidable deaths in these circumstances, Glyn Hughes estimated that about “1,000 were killed through the kindness of English soldiers giving them their own rations and chocolates.” As a man who was at Belsen, Dr. Barton is obviously very much alive to the falsehoods of concentration camp mythology, and he concludes: “In trying to assess the causes of the conditions found in Belsen one must be alerted to the tremendous visual display, ripe for purposes of propaganda, that masses of starved corpses presented.” To discuss such conditions “naively in terms of ‘goodness’ and ‘badness’ is to ignore the constituent factor …”.
* * *
Not only were situations such as those at Belsen unscrupulously exploited for propaganda purposes, but this propaganda has also made use of entirely fake atrocity photographs and films. The extreme conditions at Belsen applied to very few camps indeed; the great majority escaped the worst difficulties and all their inmates survived in good health—of course, you are never shown those pictures of robust, happy released persons. I want you to please look at the map provided (at end of this chapter) and see how many camps there were of size great enough for listing and you will note that there are MANY. You only hear about two or three and upon the false data given forth—you make your judgments. Friends, WAR IS HELL—CONCENTRATION CAMPS ARE HELL—PRISONS ARE HELL—AND HELL IS NOT OF GOD! BUT WE NOTE THAT ALL OF YOU CONTINUE TO BLAME GOD FOR “ALLOWING” THIS TO HAPPEN. YOU DID IT—GOD DID NOT!
As a result of there being actually so few instances of horror, outright forgeries were used to exaggerate conditions of horror. A startling case of such forgery was revealed in the British Catholic Herald of October 29th, 1948. It reported that in Cassel, where every adult German was compelled to see a film representing the “horrors” of Buchenwald, a doctor from Goettingen saw himself on the screen looking after the victims. But he had never been to Buchenwald. After an interval of bewilderment he realized that what he had seen was part of a film taken after the terrible air raid on Dresden by the Allies on Feb. 13th, 1945, where the doctor had been working. The film in question was shown in Kassel on Oct. 19th, 1948. After the air raid on Dresden, which killed a record 135,000 (remember the 65% target) [H: Jewish insurance companies in New York and London figured if you KILL 65% OF THE CIVILIANS AND THEIR HOME NEIGHBORHOODS—NOT MILITARY INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACTORIES FOR WAR—you can win a war!], mostly refugee women and children, the bodies of the victims were piled and burned in heaps of 400 to 500 for several weeks. These were the scenes, purporting to be from Buchenwald, which the doctor had recognized.
The forgery of war-time atrocity photographs is not new. For further information the reader is referred to Arthur Pansonby’s book FALSEHOOD IN WARTIME (London, 1928), which exposes the faked photographs of German atrocities in the First World War. Pansonby cites such fabrications as “The Corpse Factory” and “The Belgian Baby without Hands”, which are strikingly reminiscent of the propaganda relating to Nazi “atrocities”. Actually, chelas, “seeing IS RARELY believing!” You will be shown exactly that which the enemy desires you to see. F. J. P. Veale explains in his book that the bogus “jar of human soap” solemnly introduced by the Soviet prosecution at Nuremberg was a deliberate jibe at the famous British “Corpse Factory” myth, in which the ghoulish Germans were supposed to have obtained various commodities from processing corpses. (Veale, ibid. p. 192). This accusation was one for which the British Government apologized after 1918. It received new life after 1945 in the tale of lamp shades of human skin, which was certainly as fraudulent as the Soviet “human soap”. In fact, from Manvell and Frankl we have the grudging admission that the lamp shade evidence at Buchenwald Trial “later appeared to be dubious” (THE INESCAPABLE CRIME, p. 84). It was given by a certain Andreas Pfaffenberger in a “written affidavit” of the kind discussed earlier, but in 1948 General Lucius Clay admitted that the affidavits used in the trial appeared after more thorough investigation to have been mostly ‘hearsay’.
Now you who wish to think this kind of photographic license is unusual and too difficult to fake—I SUGGEST YOU TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT THE RECENT PHOTOGRAPHS COMING OUT OF ASIA REGARDING POW/MIA’s. The government claims they are ALL fakes—I assure you that SOME are fakes (and poor fakes, at best). YOU cannot have it both ways as suits your desires for “beliefs”. You are going to find that a lot of the pictures you have been shown were actually REAL, it was only that they were from other times—all the way back to your own U.S. Civil War—transposed and presented as German Concentration Camp “evidence”. [H: AND WHO but the “Hollywood Jew” has the practice AND EXPERTISE at making movie magic for your enjoyment!]
Another less formidable reminder of trick photography is the National Inquirer’s picture of Oprah Winfrey’s face attached to Ann Margaret’s body—on the front page, yet! Well, most “inquiring minds” don’t REALLY WANT TO KNOW!
An excellent work on the fake atrocity photographs pertaining to the myth of the Six Million is Dr. Udo Salendy’s Bild Dokumente fuer die Geschichtsschreibung? (Vlotho-Wener, 1973), and from the numerous examples cited we illustrate by telling you that photographs were arranged and became what is known as “photomontage”. Close examination of these photos reveal immediately that the pictures are superimposed or tampered with. For example, one most memorable picture was of standing “skeletons” with piles of dead skeletal bodies in front of them. Of course it becomes easier after seeing the original photograph of the standing persons WITHOUT the dead bodies in front of them. If there is a way for our printers to show the illustrations, I will make them available. (See end of chapter.)
The picture in point has, for instance, a high wooden (solid) fence behind the people standing. In the final picture, this fence is removed, and an entirely new horror “photograph” created. This blatant forgery appears on page 341 of R. Schnabel’s book on the S.S., MACHT OHNE MORAL: EINE DOKUMENTATION UNDER DIE SS (Frankfurt, 1957), with the caption “Mauthausen”. (Walendy cites eighteen other examples of forgery in Schnabel’s book.) The same photograph appeared in the PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL, Vol. XXX, p. 421, likewise purporting to illustrate Mauthausen Camp. It is also illustrated without a caption in Eugue Aroneau’s KONZENTRATIONLAGER Document F 321 for the International Court at Nuremberg: Heinz Kuhnrich’s DER KZ-STAAT (Berlin, 1960, p. 81); Vaclav Berdych’s MAUTHAUSEN (Prague, 1959); and Robert Neumann’s HITLER-AUFSTIEG UND UNTERGANG DES DRITTEN REICHES (Munich, 1961).
Remember, dear ones, these are technicians of superb talent—these are the same film makers who now control your media and motion picture industries—illusion is the name of their game and they are exceptionally good at that which they do.
THE JEWS AND THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS:
A FACTUAL APPRAISAL BY THE RED CROSS
There is a survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World War Two and the conditions of Germany’s concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS ON ITS ACTIVITIES DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR, Geneva, 1948. This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works: DOCUMENTS SUR L'ACTIVITE DU CICR EN FAVEUR DES CIVILS DETENUS DANS LES CAMPS DE CONCENTRATION ON ALLEMAGNE 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and INTER ARMA CARITAS: THE WORK OF THE ICRC DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frederich Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value.
ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva Military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the German authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision.
The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e., as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the second type as “Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, “Schutzhaftlinge”), who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces” (Vol. III, p. 73). These persons, it continues, “were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons” (p. 74).
The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and “From Feb. 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and prisons” (Vol. III, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief program which continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.
The report states that, “As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps” (Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Floha, Ravensbruck, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany. The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83). In the course of the war, “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organizations throughout the world, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee of New York” (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organization was permitted by the German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.
The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April 1945. This camp, “where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries, was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75). According to the Report, “The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich .... These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy; … two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favorable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p. 642).
The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet [H: Khazar “Jew”—not Hebrew Judean “Jew” of your Holy Bible] occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.
One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at least informed the ICRC on Feb. 1, 1945 …. In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorized to stay in each camp …” (Vol. III, p. 83). Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross is quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (INTER ARMA CARITAS, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for all people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.
In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis-occupied [H: namely, German’s side of the war] Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. [H: This is what Mel Gibson’s father was talking about when he told the world that the Jews are pulling a world-wide scam on everyone else, and have stolen hundreds of billions of dollars from you Christians, and now are trying to foreclose an America itself in the name of ZIONISM!] In all its 1,600 pages the Report DOES NOT even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigors and privation, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day.
So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff.). Incidentally, it is quite frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. [H: The facts are that attempting to use those rooms as “gas chambers” would have killed the operators on the outside as well!] Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry, were inspected by the delegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged.” (Vol. III, p. 594)
Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (1. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population”, and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination program”, and with the claim in the forged Hoess memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing “every single Jew he could lay his hands on”. (Is it also not interesting that holocaust centers, such as in Michigan just outside Detroit, have an EXACT NUMBER of murdered Jews? 6,258,484 or something; obviously someone was standing there with a clicker counting heads as each and every one of them was systematically “put to death”. Or, does it now seem obvious that one gigantic lie is being told over, and over, and over, and over … “We must never forget, never forget, never forget, never forget …” repeats the Jew—CONSTANTLY SO YOU NEVER FORGET THE LIE!) In Slovakia, for instance, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that, “A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been I comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labor market” (Vol. I, p. 646).
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey (basically ancestral birthplaces of modern Zionism). Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. I, p. 645). As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in Southern France for American aliens.
The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities, “Until March 1944,” says the Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued. The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States … now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I, p. 649).
THE TRUTH AT LAST: THE WORK OF PAUL RASSINIER
Without doubt the most important contribution to a truthful study of the extermination question has been the work of the French historian, Professor Paul Rassinier. The pre-eminent value of this work lies first in the fact that Rassinier actually experienced life in the German concentration camps, and also that, as a Socialist Intellectual and anti-Nazi, nobody could be less inclined to defend Hitler and National Socialism. Yet, for the sake of justice and historical truth, Rassinier spent the remainder of his post-war years until his death in 1966 pursuing research which utterly refuted the Myth of the Six Million and the legend of Nazi diabolism.
DO YOU NOT YET SEE? YOUR ENEMY WAS NEVER THE NAZI GERMANS—YOUR ENEMY HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE SOVIET KHAZARIANS (TURKS WHO CALL THEMSELVES “JEWS” SO THEY CAN HIDE IN THE HERITAGE OF THE J-U-D-E-A-N HEBREWS) WHO TOOK THE FORM OF KHAZARIAN ZIONISTS. THEY WARNED YOU, THESE SOVIETS—“WE WILL TAKE YOU (AMERICA) WITHOUT EVEN FIRING A SHOT!” and Lenin’s “We will hang them (Americans) and they will give us the rope with which to do it!”
From 1933 until 1943, Rassinier was a professor of history in the College d’Enseignement General at Belfort, Academy de Besancon. During the war he engaged in resistance activity until he was arrested by the Gestapo on October 30, 1943, and as a result was confined in the German concentration camps at Buchenwald and Dora until 1945. At Buchenwald, towards the end of the war, he contracted typhus, which so damaged his health that he could not resume his teaching! After the war, Professor Rassinier was awarded the Medaille de la Resistance and the Reconnaissance Francaise, and was elected to the French Chamber of Deputies, from which he was ousted by the Communists in Nov. 1946.
Rassinier then embarked on his great work, a systematic analysis of alleged German war atrocities, in particular the supposed “extermination” of the Jews. Not surprisingly, his writings are little known; they have rarely been translated from the French and none at all have appeared in English. His most important works were: LE MENSONGE D’ULYSSE (The Lies of Odysseus, Paris, 1949), a sequel which further refuted the impostures of propagandists concerning German concentration camps. His monumental task was completed with two final volumes, LE VERITABLE PROCESS EICHMANN (1962) AND LE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN (1964), in which Rassinier exposes the dishonest and reckless distortions concerning the fate of the Jews by a careful statistical analysis. The last work also examines the political and financial significance of the extermination legend and its exploitation by Israel and the Communist [H: JEWS ARE “COMMUNIST SOVIETS”—RUSSIANS ARE CHRISTIANS] powers.
Who do you think was instrumental in setting up the U.N.? What about establishing Israel? Who arranged to be sure it is a Soviet leader in charge of the U.N. military forces? [H: The U.N. is Nostrodamus’ BLUE TURBAN ANTI-CHRIST FORCES set to take the world in “the last days”. Watch out for them!] Ah HA! Perhaps the light is beginning to dawn in the brains??? The so-called “JEWS” HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH MOST OF THE POLITICAL FAÇADE!!! YOU, AMERICA AND WORLD—ARE AT WAR WITH THE SOVIET UNION KHAZARS AND MISLABELED “JEWS” (THE ELITE BANKSTERS OF YOUR GLOBE). YOU ARE BUT SHADOW-BOXING WHEN YOU ARGUE OVER SO-CALLED “SEMITIC” NONSENSE—THAT IS ONLY A MISLEADING DISTRACTOR. WHY BUSH? BECAUSE HE HAS SUCH A HISTORICAL RECORD OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES THAT HE IS TOTALLY BLACKMAILED—THE WHOLE PARTY, ADMINISTRATION, AND CONGRESS CANNOT AFFORD TO HAVE THEIR CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES BROUGHT TO LIGHT—YOU ARE EXPERIENCING A TOTAL CONTROL OF YOUR GOVERNMENT THROUGH INFILTRATION AND BLACKMAIL.
One of the many merits of Rassinier’s work is exploding the myth of the unique German “wickedness”; and he reveals with devastating force how historical truth has been obliterated in an impenetrable fog of partisan propaganda. His researches demonstrate conclusively that the fate of the Jews during World War Two, once freed from distortion and reduced to proper proportions, loses its much vaunted “enormity” and is seen to be only one act in a greater and much wider tragedy. In an extensive lecture tour in West Germany in the spring of 1960, Professor Rassinier emphasized to his German audiences that it was high time for a rebirth of the truth regarding the extermination legend, and that the Germans themselves should begin it since the allegation remained a wholly unjustifiable blot on Germany in the eyes of the world.
You will please note, however, that the law came down on the Germans making it a felony crime to even debate the orthodox Jewish expression of the Holocaust. YOU ARE NEXT, AMERICA, FOR THE BILL AWAITS THE PASSAGE IN YOUR CONGRESS AND THE UNITED NATIONS. [H: HOLD THAT U.S. CONSTITUTION—IT IS ALL THAT STANDS IN THEIR WAY!]
THE IMPOSTURE OF “GAS CHAMBERS”
Rassinier entitled his first book THE LIES OF ODYSSEUS in commemoration of the fact that travelers always return bearing tall stories, and until his death he investigated all the stories of extermination literature and attempted to trace their authors. He made short work of the extravagant claims about gas chambers at Buchenwald in David Rousset’s THE OTHER KINGDOM (New York, 1947): himself an inmate of Buchenwald, Rassinier proved that no such things ever existed there (LE MENSONGE D’ULYSSE, p. 209 ff.). Rassinier also traced Abbe Jean-Paul Renard, and asked him how he could possibly have testified in his book CHAINES ET LUMIERES that gas chambers were in operation at Buchenwald. Renard replied that others had “told him of their existence”, and hence he had been willing to pose as a witness of things that he had never SEEN (ibid. p. 209 ff.).
Rassinier also investigated Denise Dufournier’s RAVENSBRUCK: THE WOMEN’S CAMP OF DEATH (London, 1948) and again found that the authoress had no other evidence for gas chambers there than the vague “rumors” which Charlotte Bormann stated were deliberately spread by communist political prisoners. Similar investigations were made of such books as Philip Friedman’s THIS WAS AUSCHWITZ: THE STORY OF A MURDER CAMP (N.Y., 1946) and Eugene Kogon’s THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF HELL (N.Y., 1950), and he found that none of these authors could produce an authentic eye-witness of a gas chamber at Auschwitz, nor had they so much as “seen” one. Rassinier mentions Kogon’s claim that a deceased former inmate, Janda Weiss, had said to Kogan alone that she had witnessed gas chambers at Auschwitz, but of course, since this person was apparently dead, Rassinier was unable to investigate the claim. He was able to interview Benedikt Kausky, author of TEUFEL UND VERDAMMTE, who had alleged that millions of Jews were exterminated at Auschwitz. However, Kautsky only confirmed to Rassinier the confession in his book, namely, that never at any time had he seen a gas chamber, and that he based his information on what others had “told him”.
The palm for extermination literature is awarded by Rassinier to Miklos Nyizili’s DOCTOR AT AUSCHWITZ, in which the falsification of facts, the evident contradictions and shameless lies show that the author is speaking of places which it is obvious he has never seen (LE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN, p. 52). According to this “doctor of Auschwitz”, 25,000 victims were exterminated every day for four and a-half years, which is a grandiose advance on Olga Lengyel’s 24,000 a day for two and a-half years. It would mean a total of forty-one million victims at Auschwitz by 1945, two and a-half times the total pre-war Jewish population of the WORLD. When Rassinier attempted to discover the identity of this strange “witness”, he was told that “he had died some time before the publication of the book”. Rassinier is convinced that he was never anything but a mythical figure.
Since the war, Rassinier has, in fact, toured Europe in search of somebody who was an actual eye-witness of gas chamber exterminations in German concentration camps during World War Two, but he HAS NEVER FOUND EVEN ONE SUCH PERSON. He discovered that not one of the authors of the many books charging that the Germans had exterminated millions of Jews had even seen a gas chamber built for such purposes, much less seen one in operation, nor could any of these authors produce a living authentic witness who had done so. Invariably, former prisoners such as Renard, Kautsky and Kogan based their statements, not upon what they had actually seen, but upon what they heard, always from ones already dead and thus not in a position to confirm or deny their statements.
Certainly the most important fact to emerge from Rassinier’s studies, and of which there is now no doubt at all, is the utter imposture of “gas chambers”. Serious investigation carried out in the sites themselves have revealed with irrefutable proof that, contrary to the declarations of the surviving “witnesses” examined above, no gas chambers whatsoever existed in the German Camps at Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, Ravensbruck, Dachau and Dora, or Mauthausen in Austria. This fact, which we noted earlier was attested to by Stephen Pinter of the U.S. War Office, has not been recognized and admitted officially by the Institute of Contemporary History at Munich. However, Rassinier points out that, in spite of this, “witnesses” again declared at the Eichmann trial that they had seen prisoners at Bergen-Belsen setting out for the gas chambers. So far as the eastern camps of Poland are concerned, Rassinier shows that the sole evidence attesting to the existence of gas chambers at Treblinka, Chelmno, Belzec, Maidanek and Sobibor are the discredited memoranda of Kurt Gerstein referred to above. His original claim, it will be recalled, was that an absurd 40 million people had been exterminated during the war, while in his first signed memorandum he reduced the number to 25 million. Further reductions were made in his second memorandum. These documents were considered of such dubious authenticity that they were not even admitted by the Nuremberg Court (and that court entertained every bit of garbage drummed up), though they continue to circulate in three different versions one in German (distributed in schools) and two in French, none of which agree with each other. The German version was featured as “evidence” at the Eichmann Trial in 1961.
Finally, Professor Rassinier draws attention to an important admission by Dr. Kubovy, director of the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Tel-Aviv, made in LA TERRE RETROUVEE, Dec. 15, 1960. Dr. Kubovy recognized that not a single order for extermination exists from Hitler, Himmler, Heydrich or Goering LE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN, p. 31, 39).
“SIX MILLION” FALSEHOOD REJECTED
As for the fearful propaganda figure of the Six Million, Professor Rassinier rejects it on the basis of an extremely detailed statistical analysis. He shows that the number has been falsely established, on the one hand through inflation by the pre-war Jewish population by ignoring all emigration and evacuations, and on the other by a corresponding deflation of the number of survivors after 1945. This was the method used by the World Jewish Congress. Rassinier also rejects any written or oral testimony to the Six Million given by the kind of “witnesses” cited above, since they are full of contradictions, exaggerations, and falsehoods. He gives the example of Dachau casualties, noting that in 1946, Pastor Niemoller reiterated Auerbach’s fraudulent “238,000” deaths there, while in 1962 Bishop Neuhausseler of Munich stated in a speech at Dachau that only 30,000 people died “of the 200,000 persons from thirty-eight nations who were interned there” (LE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN, p.12). Today, the estimate has been reduced by several more thousands, and so it goes on. Rassinier concludes, too, that testimony in support of the Six Million given by accused men such as Hoess, Hoettl, Wisliceny and Hoellriegel, who were faced with the prospect of being condemned to death or with the hope of obtaining a reprieve, and who were frequently tortured during their detention, is completely untrustworthy.
Rassinier finds it very significant that the figure of Six Million was not mentioned in court during the Eichmann trial. “The prosecution at the Jerusalem trial was considerably weakened by its central motif, the six million European Jews alleged to have been exterminated in gas chambers. It was an argument that easily won conviction the day after the war ended, amidst the general state of spiritual and material chaos. Today, many documents have been published which were not available at the time of the Nuremberg Trials, and which tend to prove that if the Jewish nationals were wronged and persecuted by the Hitler regime, there could not possibly have been six million victims” (ibid. p. 125).
With the help of one hundred pages of cross-checked statistics, Professor Rassinier concludes in ULE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN that the number of Jewish casualties during the Second World War could not have exceeded 1,200,000, and he noted that this has finally been accepted as valid by the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Paris. (WHY HAVEN’T YOU BEEN TOLD OF THIS RECOGNITION?) However, he regards such figure as a maximum limit, and refers to the lower accepted number of 896,892 casualties in a study of the same problem by the Jewish statistician Raul Hilberg. Rassinier points out that the State of Israel nevertheless continues to claim compensation for six million dead, EACH ONE REPRESENTING AN INDEMNITY OF 5,000 MARKS. (Could we be getting to a better picture of the facts?) I believe any school child could see that it is far more desirable to receive money in the amount of 5,000 marks for each of Six Million persons than only 896,892. It seems Khazarian Communist (Soviet) run Israel always comes out ahead in the money category, at your expense, in every confrontation whether or not it even involves them.
EMIGRATION: THE FINAL SOLUTION
Prof. Rassinier is emphatic in stating that the German Government never had any policy other than the emigration of Jews overseas. He shows that after the promulgation of the Nuremberg Race Laws in September 1935, the Germans negotiated with the British for the transfer of German Jews to Palestine on the basis of the Balfour Declaration. When this failed, they asked other countries to take charge of them, but these refused (ibid. p. 20). The Palestine project was revived in 1938, but broke down because Germany could not negotiate their departure on the basis of 3,000,000 marks, as demanded by Britain, without some agreement for compensation. Despite these difficulties, Germany did manage to secure the emigration of the majority of their Jews, mostly to the United States. Rassinier also refers to the French refusal of Germany’s Madagascar Plan at the end of 1940. “In a report of the 21st August, 1942, the Secretary of State for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Third Reich, Luther, decided that it would be possible to negotiate with France in this direction and described conversations which had taken place between July and December 1940, and which were brought to a halt following the interview with Montoire on Dec. 13, 1940, by Pierre-Etienne Flandin, Laval’s successor. During the whole of 1941, the Germans hoped that they would be able to re-open these negotiations and bring them to a happy conclusion” (ibid. p. 108).
After the outbreak of war, the Jews, who, as Rassinier reminds us, had declared economic and financial war on Germany as early as 1933, were interned in concentration camps, “which is the way countries all over the world treat enemy aliens [H: This is exactly what the Jews have now done to America—DECLARED ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL WAR!] in time of war …. It was decided to regroup them and put them to work in one immense ghetto which, after the successful invasion of Russia, was situated towards the end of 1941 in the so-called Eastern territories near the former frontier between Russia and Poland: at Auschwitz, Chelmno, Belzec, Maidanek, Treblinka, etc…. There they were to wait until the end of the war for the re-opening of international discussions which would decide their future” (LE VERITABLE PROCES EICHMANN, p. 20). The order for this concentration in the eastern ghetto was given by Goering to Heydrich, as noted earlier, and it was regarded as a prelude to “the desired final solution”, their emigration overseas after the war had ended.
Of great concern to Professor Rassinier is the way in which the extermination legend is deliberately exploited for political and financial advantage, and in this he finds Israel and the Soviet Union to be in concert. THEY CERTAINLY ARE AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN! After 1950, an avalanche of fabricated extermination literature appeared under the stamp of two organizations, so remarkably synchronized in their activities that one might well believe them to have been contrived in partnership, which they were. One was the “Committee for the Investigation of War Crimes and Criminals” established under Communist auspices at Warsaw, and the other, the “World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation” at Paris and Tel-Aviv. Their publications seem to appear at favorable moments in the political climate, and for the Soviet Union their purpose is simply to maintain the threat of Nazism as a maneuver to divert attention from their own activities.
As for Israel, the myth of the Six Million is inspired by a purely material problem. In LE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN (P. 31, 39), Rassinier writes:
“ … It is simply a question of justifying by a proportionate number of corpses the enormous subsidies which Germany has been paying annually since the end of the war to the State of Israel by way of reparation for injuries which moreover she cannot be held to have caused her either morally or legally, since there was no State of Israel at the time the alleged deeds took place; thus it is a purely and contemptibly material problem.” What do you good lawyers say about this carriage of “JUSTICE”? Obviously rules are made to suit the need of the ones who hold the power.
Perhaps I may be allowed to recall here that the State of Israel was only founded in May 1948, and that the Jews were nationals of all states with the exception of Israel, in order to underline the dimensions of a fraud which defies description in any language; on the one hand Germany pays to Israel sums which are calculated on six million dead, and on the other, since at least four-fifths of these six million were decidedly ALIVE at the end of the war, she is paying substantial sums by way of reparation to the victims of Hitler’s Germany to those who are still alive in countries all over the world other than Israel and to the rightful claimants of those who have since deceased, which means that for the former (i.e., the six million), or in other words, for the vast majority, she is PAYING TWICE. NOT A BAD DEAL!
END OF QUOTATIONS FROM PHOENIX JOURNAL #40, “THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE”, THE HOLOCAUST, VOL. II.
* * *
Thank you, Jonur, have a break and return promptly. SALU!
Posted by Dragon Slayer at 1:38 PM
Friday, October 7, 2011
New Series 63: More history: “Soviets” are Khazar “Jews”; they are not Hebrew “Jews” nor are they Christian Russians. The confusion is how the Zionists are able to fool you over WHO IS WHO!
10/18/11 from HATONN/jonur (ns63)
* * *
Continuing quote from VOLUME 2, PHOENIX JOURNAL #40, THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE, THE HOLOCAUST.
… 29, 1973, although it roundly condemned Gray’s book, nevertheless made grandiose additions to the myth of the Six Million. It stated that: “Nearly a million people were murdered in Treblinka in the course of a year; 18,000 were fed into gas chambers every day.” It is a pity indeed that so many people read and accept this kind of nonsense without so much as exercising their minds. If 18,000 were murdered every day, the figure of one million would be reached in a mere 56 days, not “in the course of a year”. [Hatonn: One more reminder about who the 350,000 PEOPLE WHO WERE “EXTERMINATED” WERE: GERMAN PRISONERS OF WAR WHO WERE STARVED TO DEATH—AND A FEW HEBREWS TURNED OVER BY THEIR “JEWISH” KHAZAR FALSE BROTHERS! THE ONES WHO ARE NOT JEWS ARE NOW CLAIMING HITLER TRIED TO KILL MILLIONS OF THEY THEMSELVES! AND THEY, THE KHAZAR “JEWS”, ARE THE KILLERS; THEY ARE ASHKENAZI—“JEWS”. THE REAL “JEWS” ARE NOT, AND WERE NEVER, CALLED “J-E-W-S”. THEY ARE CALLED HEBREWS AND/OR JUDEANS, AND ARE KNOWN AS SEPHARDIC—“JEWS” FROM SPAIN. THE ASHKENAZI “JEWS” ARE GERMAN-ORIGINED “JEWS”.] This gigantic achievement would leave the remaining ten months of the year a total blank. 18,000 every day would in fact mean a total of “6,480,000” “in the course of a year”. Does this mean that the Six Million died in twelve months at Treblinka? What about the alleged three or four million at Auschwitz? This kind of thing simply shows that, once the preposterous compromise figure of Six Million had scored a resounding success and became internationally accepted, any number of impossible permutations can be made and no one would even think to criticize them. In its review of Gray’s book, the Jewish Chronicle column also provides a revealing insight into the fraudulent allegations concerning gas-chambers: “Gray recalls that the floors of the gas chambers sloped, whereas another survivor who helped to build them maintains that they were at a level ….”
Occasionally, books by former concentration camp inmates appear which present a totally different picture of the conditions prevailing in them. Such is UNDER TWO DICTATORS (London, 1950) by Marguerite Buber. She was a German-Jewish woman who had experienced several years in the brutal and primitive conditions of a Russian prison camp before being sent to Ravensbruck, the German camp for woman detainees, in August 1940. She noted that she was the only Jewish person in her contingent of deportees from Russia who was not straight away released from the Gestapo. Her book presents a striking contrast between the camps of Soviet Russia and Germany; compared to the squalor, disorder and starvation of the Russian camp, she found Ravensbruck to be clean, civilized and well-administered. Regular baths (showers) and clean linen seemed a luxury after her earlier experiences, and her first meal of white bread, sausage, sweet porridge and dried fruit prompted her to inquire of another camp inmate whether August 3rd, 1940, was some sort of holiday or special occasion. She observed, too, that the barracks at Ravensbruck were remarkably spacious compared to the crowded mud huts of the Soviet camp. [H: “Soviets” are Khazar “Jews”; they are not Hebrew “Jews” nor are they Christian Russians. The confusion is how the Zionists are able to fool you over WHO IS WHO!] In the final months of 1945, she experienced the progressive decline of camp conditions, the causes of which we shall examine later.
Another account which is at total variance with popular propaganda is Die Gestapo Lasst Bitten (The Gestapo Invites You) by Charlotte Bormann, a Communist political prisoner who was also interned at Ravensbruck. Undoubtedly its most important revelation is the author’s statement that rumors of gas executions were deliberate and malicious inventions circulated among the prisoners by the Communists. This latter group did not accept Marguerite Buber because of her imprisonment in Soviet Russia. A further shocking reflection on the post-war trials is the fact that Charlotte Bormann was not permitted to testify at the Rastadt trial of Ravensbruck camp personnel in the French occupation zone, the usual fate of those who denied the extermination legend.
You say, “Well, these discounters can’t be believed!” Why? You believe the exaggerated and totally impossible tales of the opposition which are far more heinous to believe! I don’t ask that you “believe” one against another—JUST LOOK AT THE FACTS!!!
Let us take a bit of a rest-break before we take up the subject of the nature and condition of those wartime concentration camps. I would remind all of you that concentration camps are exactly what their name implies and, in war, it means a very tacky situation at best. There certainly were camps in which Death should have been the first name—but precious ones, they seem to all be found inside the control of the Iron Curtain Communist Zionists. It always comes back to haunt all of you—and MUST BE FACED! And still—NONE can begin to compare with the horror of the Eisenhower Death Camps—NONE!
* * *
THE NATURE & CONDITION OF WAR-TIME CONCENTRATION CAMPS
In his recent book ADOLF HITLER
At the point above, it becomes necessary to question the likelihood of this irrationalism and whether it was even possible. Is it likely that at the height of the war, when the Germans were fighting a desperate battle for survival on two fronts, they would have conveyed millions of Jews for miles to supposedly elaborate and costly slaughter houses? To have conveyed three or four million Jews to Auschwitz alone (even supposing that such an inflated number existed in Europe, which it did not) would have placed an insuperable burden upon German transportation facilities, which were strained to the limit in supporting the far-flung Russian front. To have transported the mythical six million Jews and countless numbers of other nationalities to internment camps, and to have housed, clothed, and fed them there, would simply have paralyzed their military operations. There is no reason to suppose that the efficient Germans would have put their military fortunes at such risk.
On the other hand, the transportation of a reasonable 363,000 prisoners to Auschwitz in the course of the war (the number known to be registered there) at least makes sense in terms of the compulsory labor they supplied. In fact, of the 3 million Jews living in Europe, it is certain that no more than two million were ever interned at one time, and it is probable that the number was much closer to 1,500,000—that is a LOT of people. You shall see later, in the “Report of the Red Cross”, that whole Jewish populations such as that of Slovakia avoided detention in camps, while others were placed in community “ghettos” like Theresienstadt. Moreover, from western Europe, deportations were far fewer. The estimate of Reitlinger, that only about 50,000 French Jews from a total population of 320,000 were deported and interned, has been already noted.
The question must also be asked as to whether it could have been physically possible to destroy the millions of Jews that are alleged. Had the Germans enough time for it? Is it likely that they would have cremated people by the millions when they were so short of manpower and required all prisoners of war for purposes of war production? Would it have been possible to destroy and remove all traces of a million people in six months? Could such enormous gatherings of Jews and executions on such a vast scale have been kept secret? This secrecy, you must remember, was kept from the very inmates, in the orthodox view of this matter—there are NO witnesses to any gassing—not even inmates of the camps! These are the kinds of questions that the critical, thinking person should be asking. And he will soon discover that not only the statistical and documentary evidence given here, but simple logistics combine to discredit the legend of the Six Million.
Although it was impossible for millions to have been murdered in them, the nature and conditions of Germany’s concentration camps have been vastly exaggerated to make the claim plausible. William Shirer, in a typically reckless passage, states that “All of the thirty odd principal Nazi concentration camps were death camps” (ibid. p. 1150). This is totally untrue, and is not even accepted now by the principal propagators of the extermination legend. Shirer also quotes Eugen Kogon’s THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF HELL (N.Y., 1950, p. 227) which puts the total number of deaths at all of them at the ridiculous figure of 7,125,000, though Shirer admits in a footnote that this is “undoubtedly too high”.
“DEATH CAMPS” BEHIND THE IRON CURTAIN
It is true that in 1945 Allied propaganda did claim that all the concentration camps, particularly those in Germany itself, were “death camps”, but not for long. On this question, the eminent American historian Harry Elmer Barnes wrote: “These camps were first presented as those in Germany, such as Dachau, Belsen, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen and Dora, but it was soon demonstrated that there had been no systematic extermination in these camps. Attention was then moved to Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, Chelmno, Jonowska, Tarnow, Ravensbruck, Maughausen, Brezeznia, and Birkenau, which does not exhaust the list that appears to have been extended as needed” (Rampart Journal, Summer 1967). What had happened was that certain honest observers among the British and American occupation forces in Germany, while admitting that many inmates had died of disease and starvation in the final months of the war, had found no evidence after all of “gas chambers”. As a result, eastern camps in the Russian zone of occupation such as Auschwitz and Treblinka gradually came to the fore as horrific centers of extermination (though no one was permitted to see them), and this tendency has lasted to the present day. Here in these camps it was all supposed to have happened, but with the Iron Curtain brought down firmly over them, no one has ever been able to verify such charges. The Communists claimed that four million people died at Auschwitz in gigantic gas chambers accommodating 2,000 people—and no one could argue to the contrary.
What is the truth about so-called “gas chambers”? Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department in the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made the following statement in the widely read Catholic magazine Our Sunday Visitor, June 14th, 1959:
“I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a U.S. War Department Attorney, and can state that there was no gas chamber at Dachau. What was shown to visitors and sightseers there and erroneously described as a gas chamber was a crematory. [H: THIS IS MOST IMPORTANT, CHELAS; PAY CAREFUL ATTENTION!] Nor were there gas chambers in any of the other concentration camps in Germany. We were told that there was a gas chamber at Auschwitz, but since that was in the Russian zone of occupation [H: THE ZONE THE “SOVIET” ZIONIST “JEWS” CONTROLLED], we were not permitted to investigate since the Russians would not allow it. [H: THAT IS SO THE KHAZARS COULD GET THEIR STORY STRAIGHT! TURNING 350,000 MURDERED HEBREW JUDEANS, GERMAN PRISONERS OF WAR, AND MANY OTHER MIXTURES OF INNOCENT CITIZENS—INTO 6 PLUS MILLION KHAZAR “JEWS”, SO THE WORLD WILL FEEL SORRY FOR THE WRONG PEOPLE, THROUGH A TERRIBLE AND HENIOUS LIE OF LIES—IS A LOT OF WORK!!! BUT AS YOU HAVE SEEN IN THE DECADES OF WORLD HISTORY SINCE THEN—THEY PULLED IT OFF, DIDN’T THEY!] From what I was able to determine during six postwar years in Germany and Austria, there were a number of Jews killed, but the figure of a million was certainly never reached. I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of concentration camps in Germany and Austria, and consider myself as well qualified as any man on this subject.”
This tells a very different story from the customary propaganda. Pinter, of course, is very astute on the question of the crematory being represented as a gas chamber. This is a frequent ploy because no such a thing as a gas chamber has ever been shown to exist in these camps, hence the deliberately misleading term of “gas oven”, aimed at confusing a gas chamber with a crematorium. The latter, usually a single furnace and similar to the kind of thing employed today, were used quite simply for the cremation of those persons who had died from various causes within the camp, particularly infectious diseases. This fact was conclusively proved by the German archbishop, Cardinal Faulhaber of Munich. He informed the Americans that, during the Allied air raids on Munich in September 1944, 30,000 people were killed. The archbishop requested the authorities at the time to cremate the bodies of the victims in the crematorium at Dachau. But he was told that, unfortunately, this plan could not be carried out; the crematorium, having only one furnace, was not able to cope with the bodies of the air raid victims. Clearly, therefore, it could not have coped with the 238,000 Jewish bodies which were allegedly cremated there. In order to do so, the crematorium would have to be kept going for 326 years without stopping and 530 tons of ashes would have been created.
CASUALTY FIGURES REDUCED
The figures of Dachau casualties are typical of the kinds of exaggerations that have since had to be drastically revised. In 1946, a memorial plaque was unveiled at Dachau by Philip Auerbach, the Jewish State-Secretary in the Bavarian Government, who was convicted for embezzling money which he claimed as compensation for non-existent Jews. The plaque read: “This area is being retained as a shrine to the 238,000 individuals who were cremated here.” Since then, the official casualty figures have had to be steadily revised downwards, and now stands at only 20,600, the majority from typhus and starvation only at the end of the war. This deflation, to ten percent of the original figure, will doubtlessly continue, and one day will be applied to the legendary figure of six million as a whole.
Does it now make sense WHY the Zionists are causing LAWS TO BE MADE TO MAKE IT UNLAWFUL TO EVEN SPEAK OUT IN THE POSSIBILITY THAT THE ORTHODOX ZIONIST TALE OF THE HOLOCAUST IS IN ERROR? THE ONLY WAY TO SILENCE TRUTH IS TO COVER IT AND MAKE IT ILLEGAL TO SPEAK OF THE SUBJECT. This is also WHY ones who disagree with the Phoenix material (THESE WRITINGS) will effort to STOP YOU FROM SEEING IT AND WHY IT IS BURNED AND BANNED—TO KEEP YOU-THE-PEOPLE FROM FINDING TRUTH!!
Another example of drastic revision is the present estimate of Auschwitz casualties. The absurd allegations of three or four million deaths there are no longer plausible, even to Reitlinger. He now puts the number of casualties at only 600,000; and although this figure is still exaggerated in the extreme, it is a significant reduction on four million, and further progress is to be expected. Shirer himself quotes Reitlinger’s latest estimate, but he fails to reconcile this with his earlier statement that half of that figure, about 300,000 Hungarian Jews, were supposedly “done to death in forty-six days”—a supreme example of the kind of irresponsible nonsense that is written on this subject.
Another thing that seems strange to me is WHY would ones who are so without mercy and so heinous bother with the middle step of providing gas chambers? You didn’t bother to even kill the troops you buried in the Eisenhower camp holes nor in the trenches in Iraq. Why, then, would not the people be placed directly into the ovens to be both killed and cremated? There seems to be totally illogical and inefficient methodology at play in this scenario. Do you suppose it was to insure that the Polish gas salesman, who later became Pope, could continue in business? Come, come, chelas—God gave you brains with which to REASON!
That several thousand camp inmates did die in the chaotic final months of the war brings us to the question of their war-time conditions. These have been deliberately falsified in innumerable books of an extremely lurid and unpleasant kind. The Red Cross Report, examined below, demonstrates conclusively that throughout the war the camps were well administered. The working inmates received a daily ration, even throughout 1943 and 1944, of not less than 2,750 calories, which was more than double the average civilian ration in occupied Germany in the years after 1945. The internees were under regular medical care, and those who became seriously ill were transferred to hospital. All internees, unlike those in Soviet camps, could receive parcels of food, clothing, and pharmaceutical supplies from the Special Relief Division of the Red Cross. The Office of the Public Prosecutor conducted thorough investigations into each case of criminal arrest, and those found innocent were released; those found guilty, as well as those deportees convicted of major crimes within the camp, were sentenced by military courts and executed. In the Federal Archives of Koblenz there is a directive of January 1943 from Himmler regarding such executions, stressing that “no brutality is to be allowed” (Manvell & Frankl, (ibid. p. 312). Occasionally there was brutality, but such cases were immediately scrutinized by S.S. Judge Dr. Konrad Morgan of the Reich Criminal Police Office, whose job was to investigate irregularities at the various camps. Morgan himself prosecuted commander Koch of Buchenwald in 1943 for excesses at his camp, a trial to which the German public was invited. It is significant that Oswald Pohl, the administrator of the concentration camp system who was dealt with so harshly at Nuremberg, was in favor of the death penalty for Koch. In fact, the S.S. court did sentence Koch to death, but he was given the option of serving on the Russian front. Before he could do this, however, Prince Waldeck, the leader of the S.S. in the district, carried out his execution. This case seems ample proof of the seriousness with which the S.S. regarded unnecessary brutality. Several S.S. court actions of this kind were conducted in the camps during the war to prevent excesses, and more than 800 cases were investigated before 1945. Did some go unaccounted for? Certainly, I would imagine—do you know what goes on in your prisons? What about Rodney King of Los Angeles? All we suggest is that you open your eyes and LOOK.
I FIND IT QUITE REMARKABLE THAT THE GERMANS HAVE CONTINUALLY URGED THOROUGH INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS INTO THESE ACCUSATIONS AND THE EVIDENCE WAS TORN DOWN AND THE ZIONISTS ALWAYS ARE THE ONES WHO REFUSE TO ALLOW LOOKING INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF INACCURACIES. NOW, IT IS ILLEGAL TO EVEN SPEAK OF THIS MATTER IN GERMANY—SO HOW SHALL JUSTICE BE FOUND? EVEN YOUR PRESIDENT BUSH HAS GIVEN SERVICE TO THE SHRINES—WHO WILL GIVE HEARING IF THE FACTS ARE DENIED PUBLIC SCRUTINY? DOES THIS NOT SMACK OF “COVER-UP”—READ MY LIPS??
DHARMA, IN YOUR BLACKEST MOMENTS, CHELA, AS WE WRITE AND THE THREATS FLOW—KNOW THAT IF NOTHING MORE IN THIS LIFE-TIME—YOU ARE GIVING HEARING TO A NATION CONDEMNED FOR THAT WHICH THEY DID NOT COMMIT! THEY HAVE ASKED FOR HEARING AND THE TRIBUNALS OF “INJUSTICE” HAVE MADE IT ILLEGAL TO INQUIRE. WORLD, YOU ARE IN SERIOUSLY GRAVE CIRCUMSTANCE! AHO.
Morgan testified at Nuremberg that he discussed confidentially with hundreds of inmates the prevailing conditions in the camps. He found few that were undernourished except in the hospitals, and noted that the pace and achievement in compulsory labor by inmates was far lower than among German civilian workers.
The evidence of Pinter and Cardinal Faulhaber has been shown to disprove the claims of extermination at Dachau, and we have seen how the casualty figures of that camp have been continually revised downwards. The camp at Dachau near Munich, in fact, may be taken as fairly typical of these places of internment. Compulsory labor in the factories and plants was the order of the day, but the Communist leader Ernst Ruff testified in his Nuremberg affidavit of April 18th, 1947, that the treatment of prisoners on the work details and in the camp of Dachau remained humane. The Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, who was at Dachau from May 22nd, 1940, until April 19th, 1945, also testified on March 21st, 1946, that prisoners there received good treatment and that the S.S. personnel at the camp were “well disciplined”. Berta Schirotschin, who worked in the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testified that the working inmates, until the beginning of 1945, and despite increasing privation in Germany, received their customary second breakfast at 10 a.m. every morning.
In general, hundreds of affidavits from Nuremberg testify to the humane conditions prevailing in concentration camps; but emphasis was invariably laid on those which reflected badly on the German administration and could be used for …. [To be continued.]
* * *
Posted by Dragon Slayer at 5:55 PM