6/21/2017 from HATONN/jonur (ns245)
TODAY’S WATCH
Hatonn present in service and
Radiance unto Holy God. As you look at
the madness of your political scene, know that you are NOT BEING SHOWN
THE “WHOLE STORY” OF RUSSIA VERSUS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The true power struggle is Christian Russia
(not “Soviet”), and Christian U.S. against British/Israel! This evil organization created “Communism”
through Soviet Bolshevism, so the Christian or Godly people of your planet can
always be “at war”.
This is how the
adversary to God and man functions. By
always being in conflict you-the-people MISS THE REAL ENEMY right under your
nose! And you miss the ultimate trap
that is being laid by the Luciferians to finally “gotcha”!
President Trump and President
Obama represent Black and White America—the Khazar Zionist “Jews” hate you
both! For it is America that the world
looks to for reclamation of “God/Goodness”.
The “BIG SECRET”, however, is the “Alien Question”. All else is a cover.
TIME OF VISITORS,
SHIPS AND NEFILIM
You will be wise in the
remembering as we unfold this that THIS Nibiru passage between Jupiter and Mars
once every 3,600 years causes great disruptions. When this “planet of God” begins to move
close to Earth, the Nefilim begin to make the journey to your planet in
increasing numbers. Thus you will find
craft abounding, visitors abounding and guidance as well as practical
assistance to God’s chosen (i)sraelites abounding.
Remember, “Israel” meant “Godly people” or “followers of God’s Law
and Godly ways”—“NOT A PEOPLE NOR A NATION. But the false “Jews”—KHAZAR “TURKS”—have
transformed the meaning to become a CHOSEN PEOPLE called “Israel”.
It is significant to that in
spite of the crushing defeat of the Judean revolt by the Romans in A.D. 66, the
Jews took up arms again some seventy years later in a heroic effort to free
Jerusalem and rebuild the temple. The
leader of that revolt, Shimeon Bar Kosiha, was renamed by the religious leaders
Bar Kokhba, “Son of the Star”,
specifically because of the above quoted verses in Numbers 24.
I want you to use your heads now and don’t go bonkers with your
calendars and calculators. There are
OTHER cycling planets and orbiting heavenly bodies besides Nibiru which
massively impact your globe. Also, as in
the case of planets outgrown their ability to wisely cope with technology—time-tables
are altered according to need of attention to a species upon such planets. Also, ones from the last encounter with
Nibiru/Marduk left many Nefilim ON YOUR PLACE to prepare and provide for this
very day of cycle changes which would be devastating. I suggest you not go back to sleep if your
addition doesn’t quite add up. You do
not have good records on your place and other things from cosmic aspect can be
changed in the blink of an eye.
It is obvious that the revolt the
Romans put down after some three years, in A.D. 135, was also intended as was
the Maccabean one to achieve the rededication of the temple by the time of the
return of Halley’s Comet, in A.D. 142.
The realization that you, in 1986, have seen and experienced the return
of a majestic celestial body that had great historic impact in the past, should
send a shudder down some spines.
However, the 1986 Halley’s Comet visit didn’t see a rebuilt
Jerusalem—IN JERUSALEM, did it? What
could that mean? It can mean several
things—one, that the temple in point would be in the “New Jerusalem” which
is in the Philippines—not yet risen into view.
Further, that Halley’s is NOT the comet in question. This can be plainly seen in the absence of
the all-out “in-spite-of” thrust at rebuilding the so-called Jewish Temple in
Jerusalem prior to that time. There is a
whole heck of a lot of information KEPT FROM YOU-THE-PEOPLE!
OUR SOLAR SYSTEM
The Solar System, astronomers and
physicists believe, was formed out of a primordial cloud of gaseous matter;
like everything else in the universe, it was in constant motion—circling about
its galaxy (the Milky Way) and rotating around its own center of gravity. Slowly the cloud spread as it cooled; slowly
the center became a star (our Sun) and the planets coalesced out of the
rotating disc of gaseous matter.
Thenceforth, the motion of all parts of the Solar System retained the
original direction of the primordial cloud, anticlockwise. The planets orbit the sun in the same
direction as did the original nebula; so do their satellites, or moons; so
should also the debris that either did not coalesce or that resulted from the
disintegration of bodies such as comets and asteroids. Everything must keep going
anticlockwise. Everything must also
remain within the plane of the original disk, which is called ecliptic. Nibiru/Marduk did not conform to all that. Its orbit, as previously reviewed, was
retrograde—in the opposite direction, clockwise. Its effect on Pluto—which according to the
Sumerian texts was GA-GA and was shifted by Nibiru to its present orbit, which
is not within the ecliptic but inclined 17 degrees to it—suggests that Nibiru
itself followed an inclined path.
Relative to the ecliptic it arrived from the southeast, from under
the ecliptic, formed an arc above the ecliptic; then plunged back below the
ecliptic in its journey back to where it had come from.
Halley’s Comet shows the same
characteristics, students, and except for the fact that its orbit is so much
smaller than that of Nibiru (currently about 76 years compared with Nibiru’s
3,600 Earth years), an illustration of Halley’s orbit could give you a good
idea of Nibiru’s inclined and retrograde (opposite) path. In fact, Halley’s Comet could be accepted as
a sort of miniature Nibiru. This orbital
similarity is but one of the aspects that make this Comet, and others too,
messengers from the past—not only the historic past, but all the way back to the
beginning (Genesis).
MORE ON MESSENGERS
Halley’s Comet is not alone in
having an orbit markedly inclined to the ecliptic (a feature measured as an
angle of declination) and a retrograde direction. Non-periodic comets—comets whose paths form
not ellipses but parabolas or even hyperbolas and whose orbits are so vast and
whose limits are so far away they cannot even be calculated—have marked
declinations, and about half of them move in a retrograde direction of about
600 periodic comets (which are now given the letter “P” in front of their name)
that have been classified and catalogued.
About 500 have orbital periods longer than 200 years. They all have declinations more akin to that
of Halley’s than to the greater declinations of the non-periodic comets, and
more than half of them course in retrograde motion. Comets with medium orbital periods (between
200 and 20 years) and short periods (under 20 years) have a mean declination of
18 degrees, and some, like Halley’s, have retained the retrograde motion in
spite of the immense gravitational effects of Jupiter. It is noteworthy that of recently discovered
comets, the one designated P/Hartley-IRAS (1983 v) has an orbital period of
21years, and its orbit is both retrograde and inclined to the ecliptic.
Where do comets come from, and
what causes their odd orbits of which the retrograde direction is the oddest in
astronomers’ eyes? In the 1820’s the
Marquis Pierre-Simon de Laplace believed that comets were made of ice and that
their glowing head (“coma”) and tail that formed as they neared the Sun, were
both made of vaporized ice. This concept
was replaced after the discovery of the extent and nature of the asteroid belt,
and theories developed that comets were “flying sandbanks”—pieces of rock that
might be the remains of a disintegrated planet. The thinking changed again in the 1950’s
mainly because of two hypotheses.
Fred L. Whipple (then of Harvard)
suggested that comets were “dirty snowballs” of ice (mainly water ice) mixed
with darker specks of sand-like material, and Jan Oort, a Dutch astronomer,
proposed that long period comets come from a vast reservoir halfway between the
Sun and the nearer stars. Because comets
appear from all directions (traveling prograde, or anticlockwise, retrograde,
and at different declinations), the reservoir of comets—billions of them—is not
a belt or ring like the asteroid belt or the rings of Saturn but a sphere that
surrounds the Solar System. This “Oort
Cloud”, as the concept came to be named, settled at a mean distance. Oort calculated, of 100,000 astronomical
units (AU) from the Sun, one AU being the average distance (93 million miles)
of the Earth from the Sun. Well, perhaps
God just keeps them lined up ready to fling off in the direction of planets
needing discipline?
COMETS ARE “WILD
CARDS”
Because of perturbations and
inter-cometal collisions, some of the cometary horde may have come closer to
only 50,000 AU from the Sun (which is still ten thousand times the distance of
Jupiter from the Sun). Passing stars
occasionally perturb these comets and send them flying toward the Sun. Some, under the gravitational influence of
the planets, mainly Jupiter, become medium or short period comets, some
especially influenced by the mass of Jupiter are forced into reversing their
course. This, briefly, is how the Oort
cloud concept is usually
stated. This however is not
correct. Comets are the one star craft
“system” that can be totally controlled without consideration of any of those
planetary restrictions. Until you can
come into the realization of this fact you cannot realize the changes destined
to occur in your upcoming near future.
But let us continue to look at
that which is recognized in scientific circles.
Since the 1950’s the number of observed
comets has increased by more than 50 percent, and computer technology has made
possible the projection backward of cometary motions to determine their
source. This is proof enough that
science is full of “it”. How could
comets have “increased” by more than 50 percent? What has changed?
One team of the Harvard-Smithsonian
Observatory under Brian G. Marsden has shown that 200 observed comets with
periods of 250 years or more, no more than 10 percent could have entered the
Solar System from outer space; 90 percent have always been bound to the Sun as
the focus of their orbits. This is total
hogwash—“garbage in—garbage out”! But
then Whipple covered the assets a bit by saying, “If we are really seeing
comets coming from the void, we should expect them to fly by much faster than
just 0.8 kilometers per second,” which they do not. In
other words—you don’t really know a confounded thing about it—FOR SURE!
OORT QUESTIONED
Now comes the next
bug-a-boo. During the past few years
astronomers have questioned the simple view of Oort’s Cloud—some still believe
that the cloud exists, but the new results demand that they reconsider its size
and shape. What are YOU to believe? I suggest that you start by considering
“possibilities” of facts unknown to you or your scientists and check out every
messenger that is allowed to pass your way.
The interesting aspect of the
“reconsideration” of the Oort Cloud notion is new data suggesting that comets,
by and large, have always been part of the Solar System and not just outsiders
occasionally thrust into it.
What makes this Oort worthy of
note? Not his solution to the problem of
parabolic and hyperbolic comtal orbits and not the theory he had developed
regarding other aspects of orbits. What
was important was his consideration that they were “thrust out to there” and not “born” there. You know, sort of “flung off” as with a
slingshot.
So maybe he warms up a bit in his
suggestion that “The main process now is the inverse one that of a slow
transfer of comets from a large cloud into short-period orbits. But at the epoch at which the minor planets
(asteroids) were formed…the trend must have been the opposite, many more
objects being transferred from the asteroid region to the comet cloud. It appears far more probable that instead of
having originated in the far-away regions, comets were born among the planets. It is natural to think in the first place of
a relation with the minor planets (asteroids).
There are indications that the two classes of objects—comets and
asteroids—belong to the same species. It seems reasonable to assume that the
comets originated together with the minor planets.” Summing up his study,
Oort put it this way: “The existence of the huge cloud of comets
finds a natural explanation if comets (and meteorites) are considered as minor
planets escaped at an early stage of the planetary system from the ring of
asteroids.”
Does this not all begin to sound like the Enuma elish.......?
The principle conclusion of these
suppositions is that the comets originated in a sort of breaking event in the
inner solar system. In all probability
it is speculated from your groups of wiser thinkers, that it was the same event
which gave rise to the asteroid belt and which produced most of the meteors now
being visualized. Why? Well, they don’t say so but would it not
appear that the same “other” bodies would be cycling at about the same “time”?
It was speculated that it was
less certain that the same “breakup event” may have also given birth to the
satellites of Mars and the outer satellites of Jupiter, and it was then estimated
that the “breakup event” occurred some five million or so years ago. There didn’t seem to be doubt however, that the
“breakup event” took place “in the asteroid belt”. Physical, chemical, and dynamic properties of
the resulting celestial bodies would indicate that a large planet did
disintegrate where the asteroid belt is today located.
But what caused such a large
planet to disintegrate? The most
frequently asked questions about this scenario are how can a planet just blow
up? Your people simply don’t have any
answers!
Ah but the Sumerians have
one. The tale of Tiamat and
Nibiru/Marduk, the Celestial Battle, the break-up of half of Tiamat, the
annihilation of its moon (except for “Kingu”, and the forcing of their remains
into a retrograde orbit.
EARTH, JUPITER—BANG,
BANG
As to the “destroyed planet”
theory there always comes a key criticism.
The whereabouts of the planet’s matter.
When astronomers estimate the total mass of the known asteroids and
comets it adds up to only a fraction of
the estimated mass of the broken-up planet.
This is especially true if one estimate of the planet with a mass ninety
times that of Earth is used in the calculations—which must be. Such criticism has only had response that the
missing mass was “probably swept up by Jupiter”. This called for an increase in the mass of
Jupiter by as much as 130 Earth-masses as a result of the capture of asteroids,
including Jupiter’s several retrograde moons.
To allow for the discrepancy between the mass (ninety times that of
Earth) of the broken-up planet and the accretion of 130 Earth-sized masses to
Jupiter then Jupiter’s mass can’t hold true since other studies concluded that
Jupiter’s mass had decreased some time
in its past, and there simply is a lack of mathematical “adding up”.
Rather than to first inflate the
size of Jupiter and then shrink it back, a better scenario might be to shrink
the estimated size of the destroyed planet.
That is what the Sumerian texts
have put forth. If Earth is the
remaining half of Tiamat, then Tiamat was roughly twice the size of Earth, not
ninety times. Studies of the asteroid
belt reveal not only capture by Jupiter but a dispersion of the asteroids from
their assumed original site at about 2.8 AU to a zone so wide that it occupies
the space between 1-8 AU and 4 AU. Some
asteroids are found between Jupiter and Saturn.
A recently discovered one (2060 Chiron) is located between Saturn and
Uranus at 13.6 AU. The smashup of the
destroyed planet must have been, therefore, extremely forceful—as in a catastrophic
collision!
HOW TO BACK IT UP?
What do you have to
scientifically back this up? Not a
bunch, but some. In addition to the
voids between groups of asteroids, astronomers discern gaps within the clusters
of asteroids. The latest theories seem
to hold that there had been asteroids in the gaps but they were ejected all the
way to outer space except for those that may have been captured on the way by
the gravitational forces of the outer planets.
Also, the asteroids that used to be in the “gaps” were probably destroyed by catastrophic
collisions—at least that takes care of having to locate them. In the absence of valid explanations for such
ejections and catastrophic collisions, the only plausible theory is that
offered by the Sumerian texts, WHICH DESCRIBE
THE ORBIT OF NIBIRU/MARDUK AS A VAST, ELLIPTICAL PATH THAT BRINGS IT PERIODICALLY
(EVERY 3,600 EARTH YEARS BY SOME CALCULATIONS BACK INTO THE ASTEROID BELT. The conclusions drawn from the ancient texts
were that Nibiru/Marduk passed by Tiamat on her outer, or Jupiter, side. Repeated returns to that celestial zone can
account for the size of the “gap” there.
It is the periodic return of Nibiru/Marduk that causes the “ejecting”
and “sweeping”.
By the acknowledgement of the
existence of Nibiru and its periodic return to the place of the battle, the
puzzle of the “missing matter” also finds a solution. It also addresses the theories that place the
accretions of mass by Jupiter at a relatively recent time (millions, not
billions, of years ago). Depending on
where Jupiter was at the times of Nibiru’s perihelion, the accretions might
have occurred during various passages of Nibiru and not necessarily as a
one-and-only event at the time of the catastrophic breakup of Tiamat. Indeed, spectrographic studies of asteroids
reveal that some of them “were heated within the first few hundred million
years after the origin of the solar system” by heat so intense as to melt
them. Iron sank to their centers,
forming strong stony-iron cores, while basaltic lavas floated to their surface,
producing minor planets, like Vesta.
This according to McGraw-Hill
Encyclopedia of Astronomy. The
projected time of the catastrophe is the very time indicated in other writings,
some 500 million years after the formation of the Solar System—based on the
Sumerian information.
WATER: A CRUCIAL ROLE
It IS improving, however, as
recent scientific advances in astronomy and astrophysics go beyond
corroborating the Sumerian cosmogony in regard to the celestial collision as
the common origin of the comets and the asteroids, the site of the collision
(where the remains of the asteroid belt still orbit), or even the time of the
catastrophic event, some 4 billion years ago.
They also corroborate the ancient texts in the vital matter of water.
The presence of water, the
mingling of waters, the separation of waters—all somehow played an important
role in the tale of Tiamat, Nibiru/Marduk, and the Celestial Battle and its
aftermath. Part of the puzzle was already
answered when we showed that the ancient notion of the asteroid belt as a
divider of the waters “above” and the water “below” is corroborated by modern
science. But there was more to this
preoccupation with water. Tiamat was
described as a “watery monster”, and the Mesopotamian texts speak of the
handling of her waters by Nibiru/Marduk:
Half of her he stretched as a ceiling to be Sky, as a bar at the Place
of Crossing he posted it to guard; not to allow her waters to escape was its
command.
The concept of an asteroid belt
not only as a divider between the waters of the planets above and below it but
also as a “guardian” of Tiamat’s own waters is echoed in the biblical verses of
Genesis, where the explanation is given that the “Hammered-out bracelet” was
also called Shama’im, the place “where
the waters were”. References to the
waters where the Celestial Battle and the creation of the Earth and the
Shama’im took place are frequent in the Old Testament, indicating millennia-old
familiarity with Sumerian cosmogony even at the time of the Prophets and Judean
kings. An example is found in Psalm 104,
which depicts the Creator as the Lord:
“Who has stretched out the Shama’im as a curtain, who in the waters for
His ascents put a ceiling?”
These verses are almost a
word-for-word copy of the verses in Enuma
elish; in both instances the placing of the asteroid belt “where the waters
were“ followed the earlier acts of the splitting up of Tiamat and having the
invader’s “wind” thrust the half that became Earth into a new orbit. The waters of Earth would explain the
whereabouts of some or most of Tiamat’s waters.
But what about the remains of her other part and of her satellites? If the asteroids and comets are those remains,
should they not also contain water?
VARIED WATERY
OCCURRENCE
What would have been a
preposterous suggestion when these objects were deemed “chunks of debris” and
“flying sandbanks” has turned out, as the result of recent discoveries, to be
not so preposterous? The asteroids are
celestial objects in which water—yes, water—is a major component.
Most asteroids belong to two
classes as you can recognize them. About
15 percent belong to the S type, which have reddish surfaces made up of
silicates and metallic iron. About 75
percent are the C type. They are
carbonaceous (containing carbon), and it is these that have been found to
contain water. The water discovered in
such asteroids through spectrographic studies is not in liquid form; since
asteroids have no “atmospheres” any water on their surface would quickly
dissipate. But the presence of water
molecules in the surface materials indicates that the minerals that make up the
asteroid have captured water and combined with it. Direct confirmation of this finding was
observed in August 1982, when a small asteroid that came too close to Earth
plunged into the Earth’s atmosphere and disintegrated. It was seen as “a rainbow with a long tail
going across the sky”. A rainbow appears
when sunlight falls on a collection of water drops, such as rain, fog, or
spray.
When the asteroid is more like
what its name originally implied, “minor planet”, actual water in liquid form
could well be present. Examination of
the infrared spectrum of the largest and first to be discovered asteroid Ceres
shows an extra dip in the spectral readings that is the result of free water
rather than water bound to minerals.
Since free water even on Ceres will quickly evaporate, the astronomers
surmise that Ceres must have a constant source of water welling up from its
interior.
The celestial body designated
2060 Chiron, interestingly in many ways, also confirms the presence of water in
the remnants of the Celestial Battle.
When Charles Kowal of the Hale Observatories on Mount Palomar in
California (where the Photon secret studies are going on), discovered it in November
1977, he was not certain what it was. He
simply referred to it as a planetoid, named it temporarily “O-K” for “Object
Kowal”, and opined that it might be a wayward satellite of either Saturn or
Uranus. Several weeks of follow-up
studies revealed an orbit much more elliptical than that of planets or
planetoids, one closer to that of comets.
By 1981 the object was determined to be an asteroid. Perhaps one of others to be found reaching as
far out as Uranus, Neptune or beyond, and was given the designation 2060
Chiron. However, by 1989, further
observations by astronomers at Kitt Peak National Observatory (Arizona)
detected an extended atmosphere of carbon dioxide and dust around Chiron,
suggesting that it is more comet-like.
The latest observations have also established that Chiron “is
essentially a dirty snowball composed of water, dust and carbon-dioxide ice”.
If Chiron proves to be more a
comet than an asteroid, it will only serve as further evidence that both classes of these remnants of the Genesis
event contain water.
When a comet is far away from the
Sun, it appears as a dark and invisible object.
As it nears the Sun, the Sun’s radiation brings the comet’s nucleus to
life. It develops a gaseous head (the
coma) and then a tail made up of gases and dust ejected by the nucleus as it
heats up—or at least this is the way it appears and is thus accepted as good
data. It is the observation of these
assumed emissions that has by and large confirmed views that comets are
sometimes “dirty snowballs”.
Spectroscopic analysis of the emissions has shown the presence of the
compound water.
The presence of water in comets
has been definitely established in recent years through enhanced examination of
arriving comets. Comet Kohoutek (1974)
was studied not only from Earth but also with rockets, from orbiting manned
space craft (Skylab, etc.) but more especially from Soviet craft. Subsequent cometary observations have
confirmed these findings to great extent.
However, NONE of these studies, accomplished with a variety of
instruments, match the intensity with which Halley’s Comet was probed in
1986. The Halley findings established unequivocally
(at least for Earth scientists’ comfort) that the comet was a watery celestial
body.
This 1986 comet was met by many
unmanned space craft. Soviet, Japanese,
and the European Space Agency all launched craft. This seemed to give some credence to the
speculation that the Star of Bethlehem in the tale of the birth of Christ was,
indeed, the comet. NO, it was NOT. However, the flowing “tail” of the Star at
Bethlehem indicated celestial “manipulation” of some sort.
WHY THESE
SPECULATIONS?
Intensive observations began when
Halley’s Comet developed its coma and tail in November 1985. Developed its tail and coma?? This is worthy of thought for would it not
ALWAYS have its coma and tail?
Astronomers at the Kitt Peak Observatory tracking the comet with
telescopes reported it was certain “that the comet’s dominant constituent is
water ice, and that much of the tenuous 360,000-mile-wide cloud surrounding it
consisted of water vapor”. Other claims
were that “this was the first strong evidence that water ice was prevalent”,
and other equally ridiculous assumptions.
This does not indicate anything necessarily but those telescopic
observations were augmented in January 1986 by infrared observations from
high-altitude aircraft, whereupon a team made up of NASA scientists and
astronomers from several American universities announced “direct confirmation
that water was a major constituent of Halley’s Comet”. It was also then when it was discovered that
there would be an inescapable passage into a Photon Belt accompanied by
“different” waves of radiation and the increased hype upon hype about the
so-called ozone depletion.
By January 1986 Halley’s Comet
had developed an immense tail and a halo of hydrogen gas that measured 12.5
million miles across—fifteen times bigger than the diameter of the Sun. How could all this prediction of
“development” have been speculated? Does
a comet or heavenly cosmic body “develop” things just because they come within
your vision allowance? Why would the
loss of water be increased as it neared Perihelion on March 6th? It was noted that the comet was losing 12
tons of water per second. That water
loss was speculated to increase enormously—first to 30 tons a second and then
on to 70 tons a second. Boy, you were
saved from dissolution of the orb itself by an assurance of the scientists to
the press that “even at this rate Halley’s Comet had enough water ice to last
thousands of more orbits. Whew, for a
minute I thought the “messenger” might vanish.
I guess this is enough on
Halley’s Comet but the point of this was to assure you that as the Sumerian
texts have told you—there was water everywhere on these “Messengers of
Genesis”!
I would guess that what this
actually tells you is that you really don’t know very much of anything about
“out there” and “what is out there”. For
instance, let us look briefly at the celestial seeing eyes.
CELESTIAL SEEING
EYES
When the Anunnaki’s Mission Earth
reached its full complement there were six hundred of them on Earth, while
three hundred remained in orbit servicing the shuttle craft. The Sumerian term for the latter was IGI.GI, literally
“Those who observe and see”.
Archaeologists have found in
Mesopotamia many objects they call “eye idols”, as well as shrines dedicated to
these gods. Texts refer to devices used
by the Anunnaki to “scan the Earth from end to end”. These texts and depictions imply the use by
the Anunnaki of Earth-orbiting—celestial “seeing eyes”—satellites that “observe
and see”. How interesting!
Would you believe the coincidence
is that some of the Earth-scanning and especially fixed position communications
satellites launched in your own modern times look very much like these
millennia-old depictions? So, who might be deceiving who as regards
historical facts about your origins and early travels? Why has not “religion” integrated the
information? I think WE ALL KNOW THAT
ANSWER!
As you ones of Earth, the people
of the lie, come to realize WHO your enemy is, you will see the beast of
Revelation standing before you. Your
controlled major MEDIA, and so-called “entertainment” industry, and ESPECIALLY
your establishment “religions”—have been set up to destroy God’s People. You follow along, as with the bouncing ball,
to Satan’s drumbeat, not realizing that Christ has been quietly removed from
your nation and world.
Precious ones, God and “Jesus”
ARE THY ONLY HOPE AND SALVATION. Do not
push away that which evil is of no match!
Darkness cannot stand in the Light.
Remember that TRUTH!
Hatonn to
clear. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment