12/10/13 from HATONN/jonur (ns195)
THE TRUTH AT
LAST: THE WORK OF
PAUL RASSINIER
RESUME QUOTING:
One of the many merits of Rassinier’s work is exploding the myth of
unique German “wickedness”; and he reveals with devastating force how
historical truth has been obliterated in an impenetrable fog of partisan
propaganda. His researches demonstrate
conclusively that the fate of the Jews during World War Two, once freed from
distortion and reduced to proper proportions, loses its much vaunted “enormity”
and is seen to be only one act in a greater and much wider tragedy. In an extensive lecture tour in West Germany
in the spring of 1960, Professor Rassinier emphasized to his German audiences
that it was high time for a rebirth of the truth regarding the extermination
legend, and that the Germans themselves should begin it since the allegation
remained a wholly unjustifiable blot on Germany in the eyes of the world.
You will please note, however, that the law came down on the Germans,
making it a felony crime to even debate the orthodox Jewish expression of the
Holocaust. YOU ARE NEXT, AMERICA, FOR
THE BILL AWAITS THE PASSAGE IN YOUR CONGRESS AND THE UNITED NATIONS.
THE IMPOSTURE OF
“GAS CHAMBERS”
Rassinier entitled his first book
THE LIES OF ODYSSEUS in commemoration of the fact that travelers always
return bearing tall stories, and until his death he investigated all the
stories of extermination literature and attempted to trace their authors. He made short work of the extravagant claims
about gas chambers at Buchenwald in David Rousset’s THE OTHER KINGDOM
(NEW York, 1947): himself an inmate of
Buchenwald, Rassinier proved that no such things ever existed there (LE
MENSONGE D’ULYSSE, p. 209 ff.).
Rassinier also traced Abbe Jean-Paul Renard, and asked him how he could
possibly have testified in his book CHAINES ET LUMIERES that gas
chambers were in operation at Buchenwald.
Renard replied that others had “told him of their existence”, and hence
he had been willing to pose as witness of things that he had never SEEN
(ibid. p. 209 ff.).
Rassinier also investigated
Denise Dufournier’s RAVENSBRUCK: THE WOMAN’S CAMP OF DEATH (London,
1948) and again found that the authoress had no other evidence for gas chambers
there than the vague “rumors” which Charlotte Bormann stated were deliberately
spread by communist political prisoners.
Similar investigations were made of such books as Philip
Friedman’s THIS WAS AUSCHWITZ: THE STORY OF A MURDER CAMP (N.Y., 1946) and Eugene Kogon’s THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF HELL (N.Y., 1950), and he found that none of these authors could produce an authentic eye witness of a gas chamber at Auschwitz, nor had they so much as “seen” one. Rassinier mentions Kogon’s claim that a deceased former inmate, Janda Weiss, had said to Kogan alone that she had witnessed gas chambers at Auschwitz, but of course, since this person was apparently dead, Rassinier was unable to investigate the claim. He was able to interview Benedikt Kautsky, author of TEUFEL UND VERDAMMTE who had alleged that millions of Jews were exterminated at Auschwitz. However, Kautsky only confirmed to Rassinier the confession in his book namely, that never at any time had he seen a gas chamber, and that he based his information on what others had “told him”.
Friedman’s THIS WAS AUSCHWITZ: THE STORY OF A MURDER CAMP (N.Y., 1946) and Eugene Kogon’s THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF HELL (N.Y., 1950), and he found that none of these authors could produce an authentic eye witness of a gas chamber at Auschwitz, nor had they so much as “seen” one. Rassinier mentions Kogon’s claim that a deceased former inmate, Janda Weiss, had said to Kogan alone that she had witnessed gas chambers at Auschwitz, but of course, since this person was apparently dead, Rassinier was unable to investigate the claim. He was able to interview Benedikt Kautsky, author of TEUFEL UND VERDAMMTE who had alleged that millions of Jews were exterminated at Auschwitz. However, Kautsky only confirmed to Rassinier the confession in his book namely, that never at any time had he seen a gas chamber, and that he based his information on what others had “told him”.
The palm for extermination
literature is awarded by Rassinier to Miklos Nyizili’s DOCTOR AT AUSCHWITZ,
in which the falsification of facts, the evident contradictions and shameless
lies show that the author is speaking of places which it is obvious he has
never seen (LE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN, p. 52). According to this “doctor of Auschwitz”,
25,000 victims were exterminated every day for four and a-half years, which is
a grandiose advance on Olga Lengyel’s 24,000 a day for two and a-half
years. It would mean a total of forty-one-million
victims at Auschwitz by 1945, two and a-half times the total pre-war Jewish
population of the WORLD. When Rassinier
attempted to discover the identity of this strange “witness”, he was told that
“he had died some time before the publication of the book”. Rassinier is convinced that he was never
anything but a mythical figure.
Since the war, Rassinier has, in
fact, toured Europe in search of somebody who was an actual eye witness of gas
chamber exterminations in German concentration camps during World War Two, but
he HAS NEVER FOUND EVEN ONE SUCH PERSON. He discovered that not one of the authors of
the many books charging that the Germans had exterminated millions of Jews had
even seen a gas chamber built for such purposes, much less seen one in operation,
nor could any of these authors produce a living authentic witness who had done
so. Invariably, former prisoners such as
Renard, Kautsky and Kogan based their statements not upon what they had
actually seen, but upon what they heard, always from ones already dead and
thus not in a position to confirm or deny their statements.
Certainly the most important fact to emerge from Rassinier’s studies,
and of which there is now no doubt at all, is the utter imposture of “gas
chambers”. Serious investigation carried
out in the sites themselves have revealed with irrefutable proof that, contrary
to the declarations of the surviving “witnesses” examined above, no gas
chambers whatsoever existed in the German camps at Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen,
Ravensbruck, Dachau and Dora, or Mauthausen in Austria. This fact, which we noted earlier was
attested to by Stephen Pinter of the U.S. War Office, has not been recognized
and admitted officially by the Institute of Contemporary History at
Munich. However, Rassinier points out
that in spite of this, “witnesses” again declared at the Eichmann trial that
they had seen prisoners at Bergen-Belsen setting out for the gas chambers. So far as the eastern camps of Poland are
concerned, Rassinier shows that the sole evidence attesting to the existence of
gas chambers at Treblinka, Chelmno, Belzec, Maidanek and Sobibor are the
discredited memoranda of Kurt Gerstein referred to above. His original claim, it will be recalled, was
that an absurd 40 million people had been exterminated during the war, while in
his first signed memorandum he reduced the number to 25 million. Further reductions were made in his second
memorandum. These documents were considered
of such dubious authenticity that they were not even admitted by the Nuremberg
Court (and that court entertained every bit of garbage drummed up), though they
continue to circulate in three different versions, one in German (distributed
in schools) and two in French, none of which agree with each other. The German version was featured as “evidence”
at the Eichmann Trial in 1961.
Finally, Professor Rassinier
draws attention to an important admission by Dr. Kubovy, director of the World
Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Tel-Aviv, made in LA TERRE
RETROUVEE, Dec. 15, 1960. Dr. Kubovy
recognized that not a single order for
extermination exists from Hitler, Himmler, Heydrich or Goering LE DRAME DES
JUIFS EUROPEEN (p. 31, 39).
“SIX MILLION”
FALSEHOOD REJECTED
As for the fearful propaganda
figure of the Six Million, Professor Rassinier rejects it on the basis of an
extremely detailed statistical analysis.
He shows that the number has been falsely established, on the one hand
through inflation by the pre-war Jewish population by ignoring all emigration
and evacuations, and on the other by a corresponding deflation of the number of
survivors after 1945. This was the
method used by the World Jewish Congress. Rassinier also rejects any written or oral
testimony to the Six Million given by the kind of “witnesses” cited above,
since they are full of contradictions, exaggerations and falsehoods. He gives the example of Dachau casualties,
noting that in 1946, Pastor Niemoller reiterated Auerbach’s fraudulent
“238,000” deaths there, while in 1962 Bishop Neuhausseler of Munich stated in a
speech at Dachau that only 30,000 people died “of the 200,000 persons from
thirty-eight nations who were interned there” (LE DRAME DES JUEFS EUROPEEN,
p.12). Today, the estimate has been
reduced by several more thousands, and so it goes on. Rassinier concludes, too, that testimony in
support of the Six Million given by accused men such as Hoess, Hoettl,
Wisliceny and Hoellriegel, who were faced with the prospect of being condemned
to death or with the hope of obtaining a reprieve, and who were frequently
tortured during their detention, is completely untrustworthy.
Rassinier finds it very
significant that the figure of Six Million was not mentioned in court during the
Eichmann trial. “The prosecution at the
Jerusalem trial was considerably weakened by its central motif, the six million
European Jews alleged to have been exterminated in gas chambers. It was an argument that easily won conviction
the day after the war ended, amidst the general state of spiritual and material
chaos. Today, many documents have been
published which were not available at the time of the Nuremberg Trials, and
which tend to prove that if the Jewish nationals were wronged and persecuted by
the Hitler regime, there could not possibly have been six million victims”
(ibid. p. 125).
With the help of one hundred pages of cross-checked statistics,
Professor Rassinier concludes in ULE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN that the
number of Jewish casualties during the Second World War could not have exceeded
1,200,000, and he notes that this has finally been accepted as valid by the
World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Paris. (WHY HAVEN’T YOU BEEN TOLD OF THIS
RECOGNITION?) However, he regards such a figure as a maximum limit, and
refers to the lower accepted number of 896,892 casualties in a study of the
same problem by the Jewish statistician Raul Hilberg. Rassinier points out that the State of Israel
never- the less continues to claim compensation for six million dead. EACH ONE REPRESENTING AN INDEMNITY OF 5,000
MARKS. (Could we be getting to a
better picture of the facts?) I believe any school child could see that
it is far more desirable to receive money in the amount of 5,000 marks for each
of Six Million persons than only 896,892.
It seems Khazarian Communist (Soviet) run Israel always comes out ahead
in the money category, at your expense, in every confrontation whether or not
it even involves them.
EMIGRATION: THE FINAL SOLUTION
Prof. Rassinier is emphatic in
stating that the German Government never had any policy other than the
emigration of Jews overseas. He shows
that after the promulgation of the Nuremberg Race Laws in September 1935, the
Germans negotiated with the British for the transfer of German Jews to
Palestine on the basis of the Balfour Declaration. When this failed, they asked other countries
to take charge of them, but these refused (ibid. p. 20). The Palestine project was revived in 1938,
but broke down because Germany could not negotiate their departure on the basis
of 3,000,000 marks, as demanded by Britain, without some agreement for
compensation. Despite these
difficulties, Germany did manage to secure the emigration of the majority of
their Jews, mostly to the United States.
Rassinier also refers to the French refusal of Germany’s Madagascar Plan
at the end of 1940. “In a report of the
21st August, 1942, the Secretary of State for the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Third Reich, Luther, decided that it would be possible
to negotiate with France in this direction and described conversations which
had taken place between July and December 1940, and which were brought to a
halt following the interview with Montoire on Dec. 13, 1940 by Pierre-Etienne
Flandin, Laval’s successor. During the
whole of 1941 the Germans hoped that they would be able to re-open these
negotiations and bring them to a happy conclusion” (ibid. p. 108).
After the outbreak of war, the
Jews, who, as Rassinier reminds us, had declared economic and financial war on
Germany as early as 1933, were interned in concentration camps, “which is the
way countries all over the world treat enemy aliens in time of war. It was decided to regroup them and put them
to work in one immense ghetto which, after the successful invasion of Russia,
was situated towards the end of 1941 in the so-called Eastern territories near
the former frontier between Russia and Poland: At Auschwitz, Chelmno, Belzec, Maidanek,
Treblinka, etc.
There they were to wait
until the end of the war for the reopening of international discussions which
would decide their future” LE VERITABLE PROCES EICHMANN, p. 20). The order for this concentration in the
eastern ghetto was given by Goering to Heydrich, as noted earlier, and it was
regarded as a prelude to “the desired final solution” their emigration overseas
after the war had ended.
ENORMOUS FRAUD
Of great concern to Professor
Rassinier is the way in which the extermination legend is deliberately
exploited for political and financial advantage, and in this he finds Israel
and the Soviet Union to be in concert. THEY
CERTAINLY ARE AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN!
After 1950, an avalanche of fabricated extermination literature appeared
under the stamp of two organizations, so remarkably synchronized in their
activities that one might well believe them to have been contrived in partnership,
which they were. One was the “Committee
for the Investigation of War Crimes and Criminals” established under Communist
auspices at Warsaw, and the other, the “World Center of Contemporary Jewish
Documentation” of Paris and Tel-Aviv.
Their publications seem to appear at favorable moments in the political
climate, and for the Soviet Union their purpose is simply to maintain the
threat of Nazism as a maneuver to divert attention from their own activities.
As for Israel, the myth of the
Six Million is inspired by a purely
material problem. In LE DRAME DES
JUIFS EUROPEEN (p. 31, 39), Rassinier writes:
“… It is simply a question of
justifying by a proportionate number of corpses the enormous subsidies which
Germany has been paying annually since the end of the war to the State of
Israel by way of reparation for injuries which moreover she cannot be held to
have caused her either morally or legally, since there was no State of Israel
at the time the alleged deeds took place; thus it is a purely and contemptibly
material problem.” What do you good
lawyers say about this carriage of “JUSTICE”?
Obviously rules are made to suit
the need of the ones who hold the power.
Perhaps I may be allowed to recall here that the State of Israel was
only founded in May 1948, and that the Jews were nationals of all states with
the exception of Israel, in order to underline the dimensions of a fraud which
defies description in any language; on the one hand Germany pays to Israel sums
which are calculated on six million dead, and on the other, since at least
four-fifths of these six million were decidedly ALIVE at the end of the war,
she is paying substantial sums by way of reparation to the victims of Hitler’s
Germany to those who are still alive in countries all over the world other than
Israel and to the rightful claimants of those who have since deceased, which
means that for the former (i.e., the six million), or in other words, for the
vast majority, she is PAYING TWICE. NOT
A BAD DEAL!
CONCLUSION
Here let us briefly summarize the
data on Jewish war-time casualties.
Contrary to the figure of over 9
million Jews in German occupied territory put forward at the Nuremberg and
Eichmann trials, it has been established that, after extensive emigration,
approximately 3 million were living in Europe, excluding the Soviet Union. Even when the Jews of German-occupied Russia
are included (the majority of Russian Jews were evacuated beyond German
control), the overall number probably does not exceed four million. Himmler’s statistician, Dr. Richard Korherr
and the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation put the number
respectively at 5,550,000 and 5,294,00 when German-occupied territory was at
its widest, but both these figures include the two million Jews of the Baltic and
western Russia without paying any attention to the large number of these who
were evacuated. However, it is at least
an admission from the latter organization that there were not even six million
Jews in Europe and western Russia combined.
Nothing better illustrates the
declining plausibility of the Six Million legend, than the fact that the
prosecution at the Eichmann trial deliberately avoided mentioning the
figure. Moreover, official Jewish
estimates of the casualties are being quietly revised downwards. Analysis of the population and emigration
statistics, as well as studies by the Swiss Baseler Nachrichten and Professor
Rassinier, demonstrated that it would have been simply impossible for the
number of Jewish casualties to have exceeded a limit of one and a half-million
Jews and it doesn’t take a Space Cadet to point it out—you don’t add that
differently on planet Earth. It is most
significant, therefore, that the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation
in Paris now states that only 1,485,292 Jews died from ALL causes during the
Second World War (but the reparation figures have not reflected the fewer
acknowledgement), and although this figure is certainly too high, at least it
bears no resemblance at all to the legendary Six Million. As has been noted earlier, the Jewish
statistician Raul Hilberg estimates an even lower figure of 896,892. This is beginning to approach a realistic
figure, and the process of revision is certain to continue.
Doubtless, several thousand Jewish persons did die in the course of the
Second World War, but this must be seen in the context of a war that cost many
millions of innocent victims on all sides.
To put the matter in perspective, for example, we may point out that
over 700,000 Russian civilians died during the siege of Leningrad, and a
total of over 2,050,000 German civilians were known to have been killed in
Allied air-raids alone, and forced repatriation after the war. In 1955, another neutral Swiss source, Die Tat
of Zurich (January 19th, 1955), in a survey of all Second World War casualties based on figures of
the International Red Cross, put the “Loss of victims of persecution because of
politics, race or religion who died in prisons and concentration camps between
1939 and 1949” at 300,000—not all of whom were Jews—and this figure seems the
most accurate assessment.
IMAGINARY
SLAUGHTER
The question most pertinent to
the extermination legend is, of course:
how many of the 3 million European Jews, under German control, survived
after 1945? The Jewish Joint
Distribution Committee estimated the number of survivors in Europe to be only
one and a-half million, but such a figure is now totally unacceptable. This is proved by the growing number of Jews
claiming compensation from the West German Government for having allegedly
suffered between 1939 and 1945. By 1965, the number of the claimants registered
with the West German Government had tripled in ten years and reached 3,375,000
(AUFBAU, June 30th, 1965). Nothing could be a more devastating proof
of the brazen fantasy of the Six Million.
Most of these claimants are Jews, so there can be no doubt that the
majority of the 3 million Jews who experienced the Nazi occupation of Europe
are, in fact, very much alive. It is a
resounding confirmation of the fact that Jewish casualties during the Second
World War can only be estimated at a figure in thousands. Surely this is enough grief for the Jewish
people? Who has the right to compound it
with vast imaginary slaughter, marking with eternal shame a great European
nation, as well as wringing fraudulent monetary compensation from them?
This shame does not simply rest on the one nation—it rests upon the
hearts and shoulders of ALL nations. It
is these massively shameful deceits which we are sent forth to correct in
consciousness. YOU ARE
PEOPLE-OF-THE-LIES AND UNTIL YOU AWAKEN TO YOUR PLIGHT AND THE DECEIT—YOU SHALL
BE INCREASINGLY TORMENTED IN CHAOS. THE
PLAN IS TO ENSLAVE THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD INTO A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT AND THE
PLAN IS RIGHT ON TRACK TO BE OPERATIONAL BY YEAR 2000. IT IS THE EVIL INTENT TO RULE THE WORLD.
Let us close this segment and
this volume. We need no Epilogue for we
will now begin the next Volume on the same subject. You will know what has come about in your
world and you will see that your enemy is of the ones of the Khazarian lineage
having taken what is now called the Soviet Union who, in turn, deliberately set
up the State of Israel for its evil infiltration into the very beings of all
other nations, especially the United States of America wherein its most
fruitful harvest could be reaped.
Salu and may God have mercy upon
you sleeping children.
Map inset of Germany with flags
representing the Boundary of the Reich, Concentration camps, and Extermination
camps. “By a curious coincidence,
alleged ‘death camps’ were all in territory now controlled by the
Communists”. In other words, the “Soviet
half” of Germany—you know, the “Iron Curtain”—was were all the killing took
place. Remember, “Soviets” are not Christian
Russians; they are Zionist Khazar false Judeans, who now call themselves
“Jews”. This is your
Anti-Christ/Anti-God element, dear ones, and they have control over
America! Exposing Satan’s little helpers
will return your world to you. Get the
truth out!
* * *
Jonur, resume the quoting from
the previous document on the Holographic Universe, of which you all exist
in. This is your scientific PROOF of
that which is unseen—the invisible Spirit
World.
“UNCENSORED” magazine, September-December
2013
The Universe as a Hologram, by
Michael Talbot, author of “The Holographic Universe”.
RESUME QUOTING:
The Interconnected Nature of the
Universe
Such particles are not separate
“parts”, but facets of a deeper and more underlying unity that is ultimately as
holographic and indivisible as the previously mentioned rose. And since everything in physical reality is
comprised of these “eidolons”, the universe is itself a projection, a
hologram. In addition to its phantomlike
nature, such a universe would possess other rather startling features. If the apparent separateness of subatomic
particles is illusory, it means that at a deeper level of reality all things in
the universe may be infinitely interconnected.
The electrons in a carbon atom in
the human brain may be connected to the subatomic particles that comprise every
salmon that swims, every heat that beats, and every star that shimmers in the
sky. From this vantage point, everything
interpenetrates everything, and although human nature may seek to categorize
and pigeonhole and sub-divide, the various phenomena of the universe and all of
nature is utterly a seamless web. [Hatonn:
This is the example of God being everywhere (Omniscient). The fantasy of God and Creation must be
replaced with the reality of how it really IS.]
In a holographic universe, even
time and space could no longer be viewed as fundamentals. Because concepts such as location break down
in a universe in which nothing is truly separate from anything else, time and
three dimensional space; like the images of the fish on the TV monitors would
also have to be viewed as projections of this deeper order. [H: This also explains how ALL THINGS are really
only the ONE. God alone exists; everything else is a
simulation of God’s thinking in moving lights.
It is a holographic (3-dimentional) motion picture that your brain
interprets into a seemingly physical world that you experience through your
senses, which are electrical. Knowing
how your world functions, allows you to “adjust your illusion” to your desire.
At its deeper level, reality may
be a sort of super hologram in which the past, present, and future all exist
simultaneously. This suggests that given
the proper tools, it might even be possible to someday reach into the super
holographic level of reality and pluck out scenes from the long-forgotten past.
What else the super hologram
contains is an open-ended question.
Allowing, for the sake of argument, that the super hologram is the matrix
that has given birth to everything in our universe, at the very least it
contains every subatomic particle that has been or will be—every configuration
of matter and energy that is possible, from snowflakes to quasars, from blue
whales to gamma rays. It must be seen as
a sort of cosmic storehouse of “All That Is”.
Although Bohm concedes that we
have no way of knowing what else might lie hidden in the super hologram, he
does venture to say that we have no reason to assume it does not contain
more. Or as he puts it, perhaps the super
holographic level of reality is a “mere stage” [H: As in the “stage” of a
theater or cinema presentation. That is
what Creation IS—a “play” upon the screen of Cosmic Space itself! beyond which lies “an infinity of further
development”.
The Holographic Mind
Bohm is not the only researcher
who has found evidence that the universe is a hologram. Working independently in the field of brain
research, Stanford neurophysiologist Karl Pribram has also become persuaded of
the holographic nature of reality.
Pribram was drawn to the holographic model by the puzzle of how and
where memories are stored in the brain.
For decades numerous studies have shown that rather than being confined
to a specific location, memories are dispersed throughout the brain.
In a series of landmark
experiments in the 1920s, brain scientist Karl Lashley found that no matter
what portion of a rat’s brain he removed he was not able to eradicate its
memory of how to perform complex tasks it had learned prior to surgery. The only problem was that no one was able to
come up with a mechanism that might explain this curious “whole in every part”
nature of memory storage.
Then in the 1960s, Pribram
encountered the concept of holography and realized he had found the explanation
brain scientists had been looking for.
Pribram believes memories are encoded not in neurons, or small groupings
of neurons, but in patterns of nerve impulses that crisscross the entire brain
in the same way that patterns of laser light interference crisscross the entire
area of a piece of film containing a holographic image. In other words, Pribram believes the brain is
itself a hologram.
Pribram’s theory also explains
how the human brain can store so many memories in so little space. It has been estimated that the human brain
has the capacity to memorize something on the order of 10 billion bits of
information during the average human lifetime (or roughly the same amount of
information contained in five sets of the Encyclopedia Britannica).
Similarly, it has been discovered
that in addition to their other capabilities, holograms possess an astounding
capacity for information storage—simply by changing the angle at which the two
lasers strike a piece of photographic film, it is possible to record many
different images on the same surface. It
has been demonstrated that one cubic centimeter of film can hold as many as 10
billion bits of information.
Our uncanny ability to quickly
retrieve whatever information we need from the enormous store of our memories
becomes more understandable if the brain functions according to holographic
principles. If a friend asks you to tell
him what comes to mind when he says the word “zebra”, you do not have to
clumsily sort back through some gigantic and cerebral alphabetic file to arrive
at an answer. Instead, associations like
“striped”, “horse like”, and “animal native to Africa” all pop into your head
instantly.
Indeed, one of the most amazing
things about the human thinking process is that many pieces of information seem
instantly cross-correlated with other pieces of information—another feature
intrinsic to the hologram. Because every
portion of a hologram is infinitely interconnected with every other portion,
the mind is perhaps nature’s supreme example of a criss-correlated system.
The storage of memory is not the
only neurophysiological puzzle that becomes more tractable in light of
Pribram’s holographic model of the brain.
Another is how the brain is able to translate the avalanche of
frequencies it receives via the senses (light frequencies, sound frequencies,
and so on) into the concrete world of our perceptions.
END QUOTE
Jonur, have a Chapter break,
please, and resume.
