Friday, October 7, 2011
New Series 63: More history: “Soviets” are Khazar “Jews”; they are not Hebrew “Jews” nor are they Christian Russians. The confusion is how the Zionists are able to fool you over WHO IS WHO!
10/18/11 from HATONN/jonur (ns63)
* * *
Continuing quote from VOLUME 2, PHOENIX JOURNAL #40, THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE, THE HOLOCAUST.
… 29, 1973, although it roundly condemned Gray’s book, nevertheless made grandiose additions to the myth of the Six Million. It stated that: “Nearly a million people were murdered in Treblinka in the course of a year; 18,000 were fed into gas chambers every day.” It is a pity indeed that so many people read and accept this kind of nonsense without so much as exercising their minds. If 18,000 were murdered every day, the figure of one million would be reached in a mere 56 days, not “in the course of a year”. [Hatonn: One more reminder about who the 350,000 PEOPLE WHO WERE “EXTERMINATED” WERE: GERMAN PRISONERS OF WAR WHO WERE STARVED TO DEATH—AND A FEW HEBREWS TURNED OVER BY THEIR “JEWISH” KHAZAR FALSE BROTHERS! THE ONES WHO ARE NOT JEWS ARE NOW CLAIMING HITLER TRIED TO KILL MILLIONS OF THEY THEMSELVES! AND THEY, THE KHAZAR “JEWS”, ARE THE KILLERS; THEY ARE ASHKENAZI—“JEWS”. THE REAL “JEWS” ARE NOT, AND WERE NEVER, CALLED “J-E-W-S”. THEY ARE CALLED HEBREWS AND/OR JUDEANS, AND ARE KNOWN AS SEPHARDIC—“JEWS” FROM SPAIN. THE ASHKENAZI “JEWS” ARE GERMAN-ORIGINED “JEWS”.] This gigantic achievement would leave the remaining ten months of the year a total blank. 18,000 every day would in fact mean a total of “6,480,000” “in the course of a year”. Does this mean that the Six Million died in twelve months at Treblinka? What about the alleged three or four million at Auschwitz? This kind of thing simply shows that, once the preposterous compromise figure of Six Million had scored a resounding success and became internationally accepted, any number of impossible permutations can be made and no one would even think to criticize them. In its review of Gray’s book, the Jewish Chronicle column also provides a revealing insight into the fraudulent allegations concerning gas-chambers: “Gray recalls that the floors of the gas chambers sloped, whereas another survivor who helped to build them maintains that they were at a level ….”
Occasionally, books by former concentration camp inmates appear which present a totally different picture of the conditions prevailing in them. Such is UNDER TWO DICTATORS (London, 1950) by Marguerite Buber. She was a German-Jewish woman who had experienced several years in the brutal and primitive conditions of a Russian prison camp before being sent to Ravensbruck, the German camp for woman detainees, in August 1940. She noted that she was the only Jewish person in her contingent of deportees from Russia who was not straight away released from the Gestapo. Her book presents a striking contrast between the camps of Soviet Russia and Germany; compared to the squalor, disorder and starvation of the Russian camp, she found Ravensbruck to be clean, civilized and well-administered. Regular baths (showers) and clean linen seemed a luxury after her earlier experiences, and her first meal of white bread, sausage, sweet porridge and dried fruit prompted her to inquire of another camp inmate whether August 3rd, 1940, was some sort of holiday or special occasion. She observed, too, that the barracks at Ravensbruck were remarkably spacious compared to the crowded mud huts of the Soviet camp. [H: “Soviets” are Khazar “Jews”; they are not Hebrew “Jews” nor are they Christian Russians. The confusion is how the Zionists are able to fool you over WHO IS WHO!] In the final months of 1945, she experienced the progressive decline of camp conditions, the causes of which we shall examine later.
Another account which is at total variance with popular propaganda is Die Gestapo Lasst Bitten (The Gestapo Invites You) by Charlotte Bormann, a Communist political prisoner who was also interned at Ravensbruck. Undoubtedly its most important revelation is the author’s statement that rumors of gas executions were deliberate and malicious inventions circulated among the prisoners by the Communists. This latter group did not accept Marguerite Buber because of her imprisonment in Soviet Russia. A further shocking reflection on the post-war trials is the fact that Charlotte Bormann was not permitted to testify at the Rastadt trial of Ravensbruck camp personnel in the French occupation zone, the usual fate of those who denied the extermination legend.
You say, “Well, these discounters can’t be believed!” Why? You believe the exaggerated and totally impossible tales of the opposition which are far more heinous to believe! I don’t ask that you “believe” one against another—JUST LOOK AT THE FACTS!!!
Let us take a bit of a rest-break before we take up the subject of the nature and condition of those wartime concentration camps. I would remind all of you that concentration camps are exactly what their name implies and, in war, it means a very tacky situation at best. There certainly were camps in which Death should have been the first name—but precious ones, they seem to all be found inside the control of the Iron Curtain Communist Zionists. It always comes back to haunt all of you—and MUST BE FACED! And still—NONE can begin to compare with the horror of the Eisenhower Death Camps—NONE!
* * *
THE NATURE & CONDITION OF WAR-TIME CONCENTRATION CAMPS
In his recent book ADOLF HITLER
At the point above, it becomes necessary to question the likelihood of this irrationalism and whether it was even possible. Is it likely that at the height of the war, when the Germans were fighting a desperate battle for survival on two fronts, they would have conveyed millions of Jews for miles to supposedly elaborate and costly slaughter houses? To have conveyed three or four million Jews to Auschwitz alone (even supposing that such an inflated number existed in Europe, which it did not) would have placed an insuperable burden upon German transportation facilities, which were strained to the limit in supporting the far-flung Russian front. To have transported the mythical six million Jews and countless numbers of other nationalities to internment camps, and to have housed, clothed, and fed them there, would simply have paralyzed their military operations. There is no reason to suppose that the efficient Germans would have put their military fortunes at such risk.
On the other hand, the transportation of a reasonable 363,000 prisoners to Auschwitz in the course of the war (the number known to be registered there) at least makes sense in terms of the compulsory labor they supplied. In fact, of the 3 million Jews living in Europe, it is certain that no more than two million were ever interned at one time, and it is probable that the number was much closer to 1,500,000—that is a LOT of people. You shall see later, in the “Report of the Red Cross”, that whole Jewish populations such as that of Slovakia avoided detention in camps, while others were placed in community “ghettos” like Theresienstadt. Moreover, from western Europe, deportations were far fewer. The estimate of Reitlinger, that only about 50,000 French Jews from a total population of 320,000 were deported and interned, has been already noted.
The question must also be asked as to whether it could have been physically possible to destroy the millions of Jews that are alleged. Had the Germans enough time for it? Is it likely that they would have cremated people by the millions when they were so short of manpower and required all prisoners of war for purposes of war production? Would it have been possible to destroy and remove all traces of a million people in six months? Could such enormous gatherings of Jews and executions on such a vast scale have been kept secret? This secrecy, you must remember, was kept from the very inmates, in the orthodox view of this matter—there are NO witnesses to any gassing—not even inmates of the camps! These are the kinds of questions that the critical, thinking person should be asking. And he will soon discover that not only the statistical and documentary evidence given here, but simple logistics combine to discredit the legend of the Six Million.
Although it was impossible for millions to have been murdered in them, the nature and conditions of Germany’s concentration camps have been vastly exaggerated to make the claim plausible. William Shirer, in a typically reckless passage, states that “All of the thirty odd principal Nazi concentration camps were death camps” (ibid. p. 1150). This is totally untrue, and is not even accepted now by the principal propagators of the extermination legend. Shirer also quotes Eugen Kogon’s THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF HELL (N.Y., 1950, p. 227) which puts the total number of deaths at all of them at the ridiculous figure of 7,125,000, though Shirer admits in a footnote that this is “undoubtedly too high”.
“DEATH CAMPS” BEHIND THE IRON CURTAIN
It is true that in 1945 Allied propaganda did claim that all the concentration camps, particularly those in Germany itself, were “death camps”, but not for long. On this question, the eminent American historian Harry Elmer Barnes wrote: “These camps were first presented as those in Germany, such as Dachau, Belsen, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen and Dora, but it was soon demonstrated that there had been no systematic extermination in these camps. Attention was then moved to Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, Chelmno, Jonowska, Tarnow, Ravensbruck, Maughausen, Brezeznia, and Birkenau, which does not exhaust the list that appears to have been extended as needed” (Rampart Journal, Summer 1967). What had happened was that certain honest observers among the British and American occupation forces in Germany, while admitting that many inmates had died of disease and starvation in the final months of the war, had found no evidence after all of “gas chambers”. As a result, eastern camps in the Russian zone of occupation such as Auschwitz and Treblinka gradually came to the fore as horrific centers of extermination (though no one was permitted to see them), and this tendency has lasted to the present day. Here in these camps it was all supposed to have happened, but with the Iron Curtain brought down firmly over them, no one has ever been able to verify such charges. The Communists claimed that four million people died at Auschwitz in gigantic gas chambers accommodating 2,000 people—and no one could argue to the contrary.
What is the truth about so-called “gas chambers”? Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department in the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made the following statement in the widely read Catholic magazine Our Sunday Visitor, June 14th, 1959:
“I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a U.S. War Department Attorney, and can state that there was no gas chamber at Dachau. What was shown to visitors and sightseers there and erroneously described as a gas chamber was a crematory. [H: THIS IS MOST IMPORTANT, CHELAS; PAY CAREFUL ATTENTION!] Nor were there gas chambers in any of the other concentration camps in Germany. We were told that there was a gas chamber at Auschwitz, but since that was in the Russian zone of occupation [H: THE ZONE THE “SOVIET” ZIONIST “JEWS” CONTROLLED], we were not permitted to investigate since the Russians would not allow it. [H: THAT IS SO THE KHAZARS COULD GET THEIR STORY STRAIGHT! TURNING 350,000 MURDERED HEBREW JUDEANS, GERMAN PRISONERS OF WAR, AND MANY OTHER MIXTURES OF INNOCENT CITIZENS—INTO 6 PLUS MILLION KHAZAR “JEWS”, SO THE WORLD WILL FEEL SORRY FOR THE WRONG PEOPLE, THROUGH A TERRIBLE AND HENIOUS LIE OF LIES—IS A LOT OF WORK!!! BUT AS YOU HAVE SEEN IN THE DECADES OF WORLD HISTORY SINCE THEN—THEY PULLED IT OFF, DIDN’T THEY!] From what I was able to determine during six postwar years in Germany and Austria, there were a number of Jews killed, but the figure of a million was certainly never reached. I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of concentration camps in Germany and Austria, and consider myself as well qualified as any man on this subject.”
This tells a very different story from the customary propaganda. Pinter, of course, is very astute on the question of the crematory being represented as a gas chamber. This is a frequent ploy because no such a thing as a gas chamber has ever been shown to exist in these camps, hence the deliberately misleading term of “gas oven”, aimed at confusing a gas chamber with a crematorium. The latter, usually a single furnace and similar to the kind of thing employed today, were used quite simply for the cremation of those persons who had died from various causes within the camp, particularly infectious diseases. This fact was conclusively proved by the German archbishop, Cardinal Faulhaber of Munich. He informed the Americans that, during the Allied air raids on Munich in September 1944, 30,000 people were killed. The archbishop requested the authorities at the time to cremate the bodies of the victims in the crematorium at Dachau. But he was told that, unfortunately, this plan could not be carried out; the crematorium, having only one furnace, was not able to cope with the bodies of the air raid victims. Clearly, therefore, it could not have coped with the 238,000 Jewish bodies which were allegedly cremated there. In order to do so, the crematorium would have to be kept going for 326 years without stopping and 530 tons of ashes would have been created.
CASUALTY FIGURES REDUCED
The figures of Dachau casualties are typical of the kinds of exaggerations that have since had to be drastically revised. In 1946, a memorial plaque was unveiled at Dachau by Philip Auerbach, the Jewish State-Secretary in the Bavarian Government, who was convicted for embezzling money which he claimed as compensation for non-existent Jews. The plaque read: “This area is being retained as a shrine to the 238,000 individuals who were cremated here.” Since then, the official casualty figures have had to be steadily revised downwards, and now stands at only 20,600, the majority from typhus and starvation only at the end of the war. This deflation, to ten percent of the original figure, will doubtlessly continue, and one day will be applied to the legendary figure of six million as a whole.
Does it now make sense WHY the Zionists are causing LAWS TO BE MADE TO MAKE IT UNLAWFUL TO EVEN SPEAK OUT IN THE POSSIBILITY THAT THE ORTHODOX ZIONIST TALE OF THE HOLOCAUST IS IN ERROR? THE ONLY WAY TO SILENCE TRUTH IS TO COVER IT AND MAKE IT ILLEGAL TO SPEAK OF THE SUBJECT. This is also WHY ones who disagree with the Phoenix material (THESE WRITINGS) will effort to STOP YOU FROM SEEING IT AND WHY IT IS BURNED AND BANNED—TO KEEP YOU-THE-PEOPLE FROM FINDING TRUTH!!
Another example of drastic revision is the present estimate of Auschwitz casualties. The absurd allegations of three or four million deaths there are no longer plausible, even to Reitlinger. He now puts the number of casualties at only 600,000; and although this figure is still exaggerated in the extreme, it is a significant reduction on four million, and further progress is to be expected. Shirer himself quotes Reitlinger’s latest estimate, but he fails to reconcile this with his earlier statement that half of that figure, about 300,000 Hungarian Jews, were supposedly “done to death in forty-six days”—a supreme example of the kind of irresponsible nonsense that is written on this subject.
Another thing that seems strange to me is WHY would ones who are so without mercy and so heinous bother with the middle step of providing gas chambers? You didn’t bother to even kill the troops you buried in the Eisenhower camp holes nor in the trenches in Iraq. Why, then, would not the people be placed directly into the ovens to be both killed and cremated? There seems to be totally illogical and inefficient methodology at play in this scenario. Do you suppose it was to insure that the Polish gas salesman, who later became Pope, could continue in business? Come, come, chelas—God gave you brains with which to REASON!
That several thousand camp inmates did die in the chaotic final months of the war brings us to the question of their war-time conditions. These have been deliberately falsified in innumerable books of an extremely lurid and unpleasant kind. The Red Cross Report, examined below, demonstrates conclusively that throughout the war the camps were well administered. The working inmates received a daily ration, even throughout 1943 and 1944, of not less than 2,750 calories, which was more than double the average civilian ration in occupied Germany in the years after 1945. The internees were under regular medical care, and those who became seriously ill were transferred to hospital. All internees, unlike those in Soviet camps, could receive parcels of food, clothing, and pharmaceutical supplies from the Special Relief Division of the Red Cross. The Office of the Public Prosecutor conducted thorough investigations into each case of criminal arrest, and those found innocent were released; those found guilty, as well as those deportees convicted of major crimes within the camp, were sentenced by military courts and executed. In the Federal Archives of Koblenz there is a directive of January 1943 from Himmler regarding such executions, stressing that “no brutality is to be allowed” (Manvell & Frankl, (ibid. p. 312). Occasionally there was brutality, but such cases were immediately scrutinized by S.S. Judge Dr. Konrad Morgan of the Reich Criminal Police Office, whose job was to investigate irregularities at the various camps. Morgan himself prosecuted commander Koch of Buchenwald in 1943 for excesses at his camp, a trial to which the German public was invited. It is significant that Oswald Pohl, the administrator of the concentration camp system who was dealt with so harshly at Nuremberg, was in favor of the death penalty for Koch. In fact, the S.S. court did sentence Koch to death, but he was given the option of serving on the Russian front. Before he could do this, however, Prince Waldeck, the leader of the S.S. in the district, carried out his execution. This case seems ample proof of the seriousness with which the S.S. regarded unnecessary brutality. Several S.S. court actions of this kind were conducted in the camps during the war to prevent excesses, and more than 800 cases were investigated before 1945. Did some go unaccounted for? Certainly, I would imagine—do you know what goes on in your prisons? What about Rodney King of Los Angeles? All we suggest is that you open your eyes and LOOK.
I FIND IT QUITE REMARKABLE THAT THE GERMANS HAVE CONTINUALLY URGED THOROUGH INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS INTO THESE ACCUSATIONS AND THE EVIDENCE WAS TORN DOWN AND THE ZIONISTS ALWAYS ARE THE ONES WHO REFUSE TO ALLOW LOOKING INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF INACCURACIES. NOW, IT IS ILLEGAL TO EVEN SPEAK OF THIS MATTER IN GERMANY—SO HOW SHALL JUSTICE BE FOUND? EVEN YOUR PRESIDENT BUSH HAS GIVEN SERVICE TO THE SHRINES—WHO WILL GIVE HEARING IF THE FACTS ARE DENIED PUBLIC SCRUTINY? DOES THIS NOT SMACK OF “COVER-UP”—READ MY LIPS??
DHARMA, IN YOUR BLACKEST MOMENTS, CHELA, AS WE WRITE AND THE THREATS FLOW—KNOW THAT IF NOTHING MORE IN THIS LIFE-TIME—YOU ARE GIVING HEARING TO A NATION CONDEMNED FOR THAT WHICH THEY DID NOT COMMIT! THEY HAVE ASKED FOR HEARING AND THE TRIBUNALS OF “INJUSTICE” HAVE MADE IT ILLEGAL TO INQUIRE. WORLD, YOU ARE IN SERIOUSLY GRAVE CIRCUMSTANCE! AHO.
Morgan testified at Nuremberg that he discussed confidentially with hundreds of inmates the prevailing conditions in the camps. He found few that were undernourished except in the hospitals, and noted that the pace and achievement in compulsory labor by inmates was far lower than among German civilian workers.
The evidence of Pinter and Cardinal Faulhaber has been shown to disprove the claims of extermination at Dachau, and we have seen how the casualty figures of that camp have been continually revised downwards. The camp at Dachau near Munich, in fact, may be taken as fairly typical of these places of internment. Compulsory labor in the factories and plants was the order of the day, but the Communist leader Ernst Ruff testified in his Nuremberg affidavit of April 18th, 1947, that the treatment of prisoners on the work details and in the camp of Dachau remained humane. The Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, who was at Dachau from May 22nd, 1940, until April 19th, 1945, also testified on March 21st, 1946, that prisoners there received good treatment and that the S.S. personnel at the camp were “well disciplined”. Berta Schirotschin, who worked in the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testified that the working inmates, until the beginning of 1945, and despite increasing privation in Germany, received their customary second breakfast at 10 a.m. every morning.
In general, hundreds of affidavits from Nuremberg testify to the humane conditions prevailing in concentration camps; but emphasis was invariably laid on those which reflected badly on the German administration and could be used for …. [To be continued.]
* * *
Posted by Dragon Slayer at 5:55 PM