11/29/11c from HATONN/jonur (ns87)
[Continuing “VACCINE GENOCIDE PLAN” ABOUT THE SO-CALLED AIDS VIRUS/VIRUSES.]
Bacteria, fungi, and some other organisms are actually capable of growing outside of tissue; in other words, they don’t have to inhabit other tissue to reproduce themselves. They can grow on tissue culture plates like bacteria do. The viruses must grow inside of tissue, which requires that there be living human or animal tissue in which they may replicate.
Retrovirus means that it is a small replicating organism which grows inside of living tissue. So what does the term “retro” mean? In the case of this particular virus, it stands for the fact that contained within the AIDS virus, and other so-called human retroviruses or other animal retroviruses, are small enzymes known as reverse transcriptase. That is where the word “retro” comes from. The reverse transcriptase is where the “re” comes from “reverse” and the “tro” from transcriptase. That is an enzyme in the AIDS virus which actually is responsible for duplication of the genes of the AIDS virus which are in an RNA form, different from human form. Human genetic material grows in a DNA from.
If the AIDS virus is to insert itself into human material somehow after infection of the cell, what happens is this enzyme duplicates the RNA of the AIDS virus into a DNA form and actually inserts that into the human DNA. The AIDS virus genes get in and are actually duplicated into DNA form, copied by the reverse transcriptase. That information is then inserted into the genetic makeup of the human cell. This is now an AIDS virus residing within the human genes, which then sends out a signal for production of a NEW AIDS virus. Read carefully—NEW AIDS VIRUS!
Beyond AIDS, the genetic information of all retroviruses is copied into the DNA form by the reverse transcriptase inserted into the genes and subsequent production of new viruses.
Let me generalize a bit of information here for better understanding. Virology is the study of viruses which deals with tiny living organisms visible only with the use of the most powerful electron microscopes on your planet, as you now recognize the scientific limitations. Millions of AIDS viruses can easily fit onto the head of a small pin. The AIDS virus is particularly deadly to you humans, not because of its ability to invade and neutralize human cells, but because of the virus’s ability to put its own genetic material inside the human cell’s genetic structure, thereby allowing the virus to use the human cell as a kind of virus factory, reproducing from a human cell’s raw materials.
Unlike larger organisms, as with bacteria, viruses do not respond to conventional medical treatment. Much like your common “cold” virus, it cannot be treated effectively by drugs. The difference, however, in its attack is that the immune system is overwhelmed, which I will also present here.
_________________________
LONDON TIMES, MAY 11, 1987
On May 11, 1987, on the front page of the London Times, in an article entitled “SMALLPOX VACCINE TRIGGERED AIDS”, Pierce Wright announced that the AIDS epidemic may have been caused by the World Health Organization (WHO) small pox inoculation in the third world countries. The conclusion is, of course, that it is truth. The story is like this: Somebody had been hired by the WHO to investigate whether or not the WHO vaccine programs, which were responsible for the eradication of smallpox in Africa, may have been a contributing factor to the spread of AIDS in Africa. Evidently a researcher, who has remained anonymous, who was afraid to reveal his name, was hired by the WHO to investigate that study. He did a study over a period of a couple of years, wrote a report, and submitted it to the WHO; he was paid for his service and sent on his way.
A year or so later this researcher walked into the London Times and threw the report on Mr. Wright’s desk. Mr. Wright is the science writer of the London Times (a most respected and prestigious paper). The man said, “If you really want to know what is going on with AIDS in Africa, here is the answer!” Further, it has now even become more widely reported that the WHO suspected that its immunization program against smallpox might be connected to the AIDS outbreak. Well you might guess that WHO buried that report and promptly fired the consultant—a man of international reputation. The Times pointed out some startling correlations: “The smallpox vaccine theory would account for the position of the Central African states as the most afflicted countries, while Brazil became the most afflicted Latin American country, and how Haiti became the route for the spread of AIDS into the U.S. (The homosexual vacation playground is Haiti.)
“Brazil, the only South American country covered in the eradication campaign, has the highest incidence of AIDS in that region. The correlation is extremely strong.” The London Times is not given to overexaggeration as are your American media.
Well, this story caused an uproar and front page stories popped forth in all the papers in Europe, Latin America and other parts of the free world. Did you read about it? So be it! Why do you suppose the American people are being denied critical information which is widely distributed throughout most of the world? Are you ready for some hard facts?
Would your own people do things like this? Oh yes, dear friends, and have.
_______________________
BACK TO THE POOR GREEN MONKEY
You still want to believe it came from the green monkey? Sorry, it could not have come that route. If some jungle monkey bit someone, you would have to have a spread from the jungle into the cities—sorry, it is spreading from the cities into the jungle. You would have to know a secret: the ones most closely associated with those green monkeys are the pygmies. Funny, up until a year or so ago, the pygmies were almost clear of AIDS virus infection. THEY ONLY BECAME INFECTED AFTER CLOSE ASSOCIATION AND CONTAMINATIONS FROM PROSTITUTES FROM THE CITIES OR BY NEEDLE CONTAMINATION FROM INTRAVENOUS DRUG ABUSE AS IT SPREAD OUTWARD FROM THE CITIES.
Further evidence against the virus coming from the monkeys is found in the codon choices of the AIDS virus. That means that the genetic information of the AIDS virus, known as codon choices, is not found in monkeys. They are not found in monkeys and they are not found in man—they actually exist in visna virus and few other viruses in the laboratory. That is why the genetic structure of the genetic material, the so-called information of the genes of the AIDS virus, looks like visna virus, as we already know, in bovine leukemia virus. All of these facts show that no monkeys did it—just some humans monkeying around a bit, I would say.
_________________________
CANCER
What is cancer? Well, let me assure you that Kapose’s sarcoma and leukemia are cancers and they are the hallmarks of AIDS. Therefore, CANCER IS ALREADY A CONTAGIOUS DISEASE, TRANSFERABLE FROM ONE PERSON TO ANOTHER.
IF YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE SAFE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT GAY OR PROMISCUOUS, OR BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT SEXUALLY ACTIVE, THEN YOU MISLEAD YOURSELF AND HAVE BOUGHT THE LIE!
Your scientists do not even know whether the transferal from one person to another is of a “free viral particle” or “a viral particle inside of a cell”. That statement should terrify you. That is, in scientific ignorance, as profound as having a housing contractor not knowing whether a house is built or still in sticks and stones in a factory. There is a most spectacular difference. Therefore, when you get down to actually how this virus is being transferred, there is very little data or absolute knowledge.
They tell you that it is just a sexually transmitted disease, but they don’t tell you anything about HOW the virus is getting across the membranes of either the man or the woman. Depending upon HOW it is getting across, this has a great deal to do with how really dangerous it is in the long run.
Well, I can assure you that you are so far from a cure of the disease by orthodox methods that it matters little in the long run. It will have to have a cure resource that is specific to ALL the mutations of the virus and specifically destroyed wherever they are located. Oh yes, there is a way to do that, but all measures are being taken on earth level to prevent you from having it. There are some substances soon to be released in medication format which will give some assistance in maintenance and selective remission of active symptoms. I will discuss it in greater measure a bit farther on in this document when I get to the discussion of “combat and cure”.
CONDOMS
Your greatest advocate of condom use in prevention of AIDS spread (and remember, AIDS first exploded in the homosexual community) and control thereof, Surgeon General C. Everett Koop, made the following statements: “Prophylactics have extraordinarily high failure rates among homosexuals and offer them no assurance of safe sex.” Later, he continued: “I don’t like to acknowledge mistakes, and I don’t want to use the word ‘mistake’ in reference to that report—but …!” And then he further said, “Since the initial report was written, I am surprised to find a near complete lack of research on condom failure rates and causes. Only one study in progress has ever been designed to study the various issues of condom breakage (leakage and flaws) rates as they relate to AIDS.”
* MOST COMMON MISCONCEPTION ABOUT AIDS VIRUS AND CONDOMS *
The most common misconception being foisted upon you people right now concerns sexually active people. You are told that, if a man uses a condom, the transference of the deadly virus is virtually eliminated. NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH. OF THE BODY FLUIDS THAT THE AIDS VIRUS IS FOUND IN, SEMEN CONTAINS THE LEAST!
As a matter of fact, there is no significant amount of virus in anyone’s ejaculate; perhaps about one virus per milliliter (a small portion indeed), a statistically irrelevant amount. A most copious ejaculation might produce only one or two viruses. Oh yes, you can substantiate this in your own medical literature.
Now for worse news: You will here pretend that there are millions and billions of AIDS viruses in an ejaculation—woe is you; a condom is riddled with microscopic or larger holes natural in manufacture. THE SMALLEST HOLES FOUND IN CONDOMS ARE TWO TO TEN TIMES LARGER THAN THE AIDS VIRUS! IT BECOMES SOMETHING LIKE SHOOTING PING PONG BALLS THROUGH A BASKETBALL HOOP. CONDOMS HAVE NOT, WILL NOT, AND CANNOT PREVENT AIDS!
ASIAN TIGER MOSQUITO
Swamp fever, malaria, sleeping sickness—all are borne by insects, namely the blood sucking mosquito. How is it that your “experts” tell you a mosquito does not carry AIDS?
The “father” of AIDS viruses, bovine leukemia virus, and visna virus (sheep brain—rot virus) which is the “mother” of AIDS viruses, are borne animal to animal through bloodsucking vectors such as mosquitoes.
The AIDS virus is most certainly spread through blood transferal by mosquitoes, and most especially the one known as Asian Tiger Mosquito, which in fact was intentionally introduced into America specifically to spread the disease. It is most selective in its dinner plate and feeds mostly on human blood.
HOW ABOUT JUST MAKING A VACCINE?
How about a rundown on why there can’t be a vaccine? The AIDS virus arose by recombination (mixing) of bovine leukemia virus and visna virus. The fact is that the genes of the AIDS virus contain approximately 9,000 base pairs; each base pair then has four choices, which means that there are 9,000 x 9,000 x 9,000 x 9,000 different AIDS viruses. (Infinite, if you will.)
That means that, instead of being a single virus, there is an entire “field” effect of viruses. There is a menagerie of viruses and that, of course, explains why every AIDS virus that has been isolated to date is different.
Because they are all different, therein lies the inability to isolate and produce a vaccine. AIDS is not a stable virus such as found in smallpox. Smallpox virus is the same today as a thousand years ago; same with chicken pox, mumps and measles, and so forth. But the actual fact is that every AIDS virus isolated from every patient, more or less, has been different. The reason is because the virus reacts individually with the tissue within which it is growing. If it is growing within YOU, it reacts and individualizes to fit YOU. They spontaneously mutate incredibly. There simply can be no SPECIFIC vaccine for there would have to be greater than 9,000 to the 4th at minimum. The recombinant nature of the beast precludes successful vaccine.
Further, the virus was created to have these characteristics. The virus was developed that would intentionally and collectively destroy the cells which are responsible for processing the virus, and that is what AIDS is.
In your blood system you have cells which are called macrophages. It is the job of the macrophages to process this virus and present it to the T-lymphocyte for development of immunity. But what happens is that the macrophage cannot kill the virus, it grows inside the macrophage instead, and the macrophage is then actually injecting it into other cells throughout the body. This leads to the death of T-4 lymphocytes as well as other cells, such as a rather important group of cells called the brain.
The defect is not primarily in the human lymphocytic system, but rather lies in the macrophage system, the very cell responsible for processing the virus. The macrophage system’s job is to process the virus and send it out in a form that the body can utilize to develop immunity. What is happening now is that, if one is infected with AIDS virus and you have an antibody directed against that virus, those form a conjugate (reproduction) if you use a vaccination against the virus—that is the actual purpose of a vaccine, to produce these antibodies directed against the AIDS virus.
If you are vaccinated against AIDS, you have these conjugates formed that allow the macrophage to ingest those antibody antigens more easily. The entire complex is ingested instead of the macrophage. The macrophage then processes the antibody, the virus grows inside the cell, and you die more quickly than if you had not been vaccinated. Vaccination against AIDS would be impossible for you at this time and would prove to be most detrimental.
You now have been given rational and clear reasons why an AIDS vaccine can never be practical nor actually developed. Firstly, you have astronomical numbers of mutations of the virus, which means that a specific vaccine for a specific virus cannot be made. Secondly, the way in which the virus is processed within the human body would make AIDS infection even more rapidly fatal when treated with a vaccine.
Of course, this is disappointing to those efforting around the clock to make a vaccine. IS IT NOT MORE FOOLISH, HOWEVER, TO BLINDLY PURSUE A VACCINE CURE THAT CANNOT WORK, THEREBY DELAYING RESEARCH OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF TREATMENT AND CURE? FURTHER TAMPERING WITH THE VACCINE WILL ALSO CAUSE EXACERBATION OF THE DISEASE PROCESS ITSELF.
End of quoting from PHOENIX JOURNAL #8: “AIDS: THE LAST GREAT PLAGUE”. Jonur, please continue with the “UNCENSORED” magazine article, “Are AIDS/HIV tests—a hoax?” [Quoting:]
(Natural News) Brent Leung’s myth-shattering AIDS documentary, House of Numbers, continues to roil conventional AIDS propagandists who cannot tolerate anyone questioning their “scientific” theories. (They’re not exactly “scientific” if they can’t stand up to a little questioning, are they?)
Adding to the searing hot debate, Brent Leung has released exclusive interview footage to Natural News that calls into question conventional thinking about so-called “AIDS tests” (which don’t accurately detect HIV infections in the first place).
You can watch this exclusive, unedited footage [online] at youtube.com.
Here’s part of the exchange that takes place in this footage, in which Dr. Constantine tells filmmaker Brent Leung that the AIDS test he took is meaningless:
“I’m gonna ask you one last question that pertains to my HIV test that I took in Africa,” Brent Leung says.
“And you want this on air?’ asks Dr. Constantine.
Brent answers, “Yes. I tested negative. It’s okay.”
“Now, what if I tell you that the test you took was lousy and doesn’t mean a thing? Does that make any difference for everybody to hear?” replies Dr. Constantine.
Also in this clip, Leung interviews Dr. Robin Weiss who reveals the diagnostic failure of the so-called “Western Blot” test, which remains the mainstay “AIDS test” to this day.
“I don’t think the Western Blot is a useful diagnostic test,” says Dr. Weiss. “I don’t think it’s worth doing. Western Blots have been promoted into some sort of Holy Grail.”
This exclusive, unedited footage was released to Natural News in response to accusations leveled against Brent Leung by both of these scientists who claimed their words were taken out of context. So Leung released this footage which contains the greater context of the conversation, demonstrating that these scientists were not taken out of context when shorter cuts were used in the film.
Why AIDS propagandists cannot tolerate scientific questions
The conventional AIDS propagandists are predictably lashing out violently against Brent Leung’s myth-shattering documentary. One critic, Jeanne Bergman, went so far as to accuse Leung of propagating “lies” about HIV, even while she pressured ScienceDaily.com to retroactively change the headline of a story the website published in 2007. That story originally reported on a study in primates that showed a sudden loss of T cells is not a trigger for AIDS.
The original headline read, “Sudden Loss of T Cells Is Not Trigger For AIDS, New Study Suggests.” But after being pressured by Bergman, ScienceDaily changed the headline (nearly two years after the original publication date) to: “Progression Of SIV Infection In Monkeys Points To Differences Between Human and Simian Forms of AIDS.
That’s a fairly radical title change. It repositions the entire story and takes away credibility from anyone who had quoted the story as a piece of evidence dismantling conventional AIDS theories. That was the whole point of pressuring ScienceDaily to change their story, of course.
ScienceDaily even engaged in some fairly unusual backpedaling with an editor’s note that was added to the story: “The purpose of the story was NOT meant to suggest that the sudden loss of T cells is not the trigger of AIDS in humans, nor was there any intent to support the erroneous belief that HIV somehow does not cause AIDS. We regret any confusion that this may have caused.” Gee, wouldn’t want to challenge conventional AIDS theories now, would we?
Answering the critics
In support of the House of Numbers documentary, The Perth Group has published a response to Jeanne Bergman, which you can read [online] at theperthgroup.com.
They’ve also published a hard-hitting, point-by-point defense of the idea of questioning conventional AIDS theories. Just keep in mind that, when you read this, you’re not supposed to question anything told to you by conventional doctors and scientists. They already know everything, and the mere act of questioning their theories is blasphemous. So read this link at your own risk [online] at theperthgroup.com.
The Perth Group, by the way, was founded by biophysicist Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos, emergency physician Valendar F. Turner, and Professor of Pathology John Papadimitriou. The group has published scientific papers on AIDS, and two of its members were invited contributors to the Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel.
According to The Perth Group, HIV/AIDS experts have NOT proven:
1. The existence of a unique, exogenously acquired retro-virus, HIV.
2. That “HIV” antibody tests are specific for “HIV” infection. (This is a blockbuster realization right here. It means all the so-called “AIDS tests” are basically quackery.)
3. The HIV theory of AIDS, that is, that HIV causes acquired immune deficiency (destruction of T4 lymphocytes = AID) or that AID leads to the development of the clinical syndrome AIDS.
4. That the “HIV genome” (RNA or DNA) originates in a unique, exogenously acquired infectious retroviral particle.
5. That HIV/AIDS is infectious, either by blood, blood products, or sexual intercourse.
6. That there is mother-to-child transmission of a retrovirus HIV or that it’s inhibited with AZT or nevirapine.
The group also believes that AZT (Big Pharma’s key AIDS drug) cannot kill “HIV” and is so toxic that, in fact, it may actually cause some cases of AIDS. [Hatonn: YES INDEED, CHELAS (STUDENTS)! AND SO GOES THE KHAZAR ZIONIST “JEW’S” DEPOPULATION AGENDA—RIGHT UNDER THY VERY NOSES!]
AIDS propagandists are like global warming scientists
I’ve finally put the pieces together on this. It turns out that AIDS propagandists are just like some of the global warming scientists: They’ve already decided what’s true and they viciously attack anyone who even dares to ask an intelligent question about the validity of their so-called science. [H: Again, “Global Warming” and “Ozone Holes” are another Zionist plot. How else can a handful of fake, imposter “Jews” take your cars and trucks and shut down your airlines? Keep in mind, evil knows no bounds in the deviltry it can dream up to oppress—and eventually murder—the people. We will get to that issue in a bit, along with the latest news.]
We saw this with the leaked emails of the global warming scientists: They were clearly conspiring to manipulate the data to support the outcome they had pre-decided to be “scientific”. And yet that entire approach isn’t scientific at all. It’s dogmatic.
Many conventional AIDS scientists are just as dogmatic. It doesn’t even matter whether they’re right or wrong—their unwillingness to even tolerate sensible questions obliterates any credibility they might have previously had. A credible scientist, you see, is happy to answer questions or even critics. Credible scientific study stands up to scrutiny. It can withstand scientific challenges and weather the storm.
But none of the conventional AIDS theories are allowed to be questioned at all. And why not? Because if an intelligent, evidence-based inquiry into conventional AIDS propaganda were to ever be conducted, the whole fraudulent system would collapse like, well, a house of cards. (Hence the name House of Numbers for the documentary.)
But that can’t be allowed to take place. Much like we see with vaccines and cancer, too much money is riding on conventional AIDS mythology, and it’s too late to change their story.
AIDS myths
So the myths about AIDS continue: That a simple blood test can tell you whether you have AIDS, that AIDS is caused by HIV, that HIV is transmitted through blood, that AIDS has no cure, and so on. These are all AIDS myths because they exist in the realm of conventional AIDS dogma that is utterly unwilling to field any questions or stand up to any scientific challenges whatsoever. The mere mention of any intent to question conventional AIDS mythology brands you as an “AIDS denier”—a vicious, derogatory term thrown about like a linguistic hand grenade in an attempt to instantly halt any intelligent conversation about HIV and AIDS. [H: Hence, Jewish DOMINATION OF ALL MEDIA OUTLETS. They tell you what to think through THEIR “polls” and news “commentaries”—you then believe it is your opinion and go about your lives as informed citizens.]
You either agree with the conventional AIDS propagandists, or you’re a nut, it seems. There is no room for questioning anything. There’s no tolerance for those who might think for themselves instead of just swallowing the conventional theories as if they were scientific fact.
But then again, we shouldn’t expect anything more than that from conventional medicine, should we? This is an industry steeped in scientific fraud and routine quackery. It is a field of pseudo science that has become extremely proficient at rigging the data in order to fit whatever predetermined outcomes it wishes to support.
The AIDS industry is an outgrowth of this scientific quackery. Fictions about AIDS have given rise to an entire for-profit industry that depends on the continuation of the mythology to keep its cash registers ringing. That’s why the attacks against Brent Leung are so vicious: He’s the guy who has dared to stand up and say, “The AIDS emperor wears no clothes!”
For daring to point that out, Leung is branded an “AIDS Denier”. [H: Just like ones who point out the Jewish domination of the financial markets, and THE FACT that the numbers in the so-called Jewish holocaust are totally wrong; those daring truth-bringers are labeled “Jew Haters” and “Holocaust Deniers”. Or worse—“ANTI-SEMITES”! Remember, it is the false one labeled “Jew” who is NOT a Semite/Shemite. The ones who you see as “Jews” today—at the pawn shops and in Hollywood, etc.—are Khazar Zionist Bolsheviks from Noah’s other son, JAPHETH. Shem (“Sem”), Noah’s oldest son, is the father of the White race AND IS A SEM-ITE. These are the Judaists, the Hebrews from your Holy Bible. They are known also as SEPHARDIC, ORTHODOXED Judaists—“Sephardim” means the “Spanish Jews”, or Jews who settled in Spain after they left Palestine (now called “Israel” by the false Jews—Khazars). Carlos Estevez, a.k.a. Charlie Sheen, and Cameron Diaz are Sephardic Jews, as are a great many “Whites” in Europe. However, you are never permitted to know that. The imposter “Jews” want to keep THAT for themselves!] It’s the equivalent of calling him an “Emperor’s wardrobe denier” while pretending the emperor is wearing magnificent flowing robes sewn with golden thread.
It all just makes me wonder: What’s the point of having a scientific method if the scientists aren’t going to follow it?
Watch the footage yourself [online] at youtube.com.
Check out this other exclusive footage from House of Numbers [online] at youtube.com.
_________________________
WHO vaccine fraud exposed
WHO Scientists Corruption Scandals Appear Endemic
By F. William Engdahl, Author of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order, January 11, 2010.
The much-touted threat of an H1N1 Pandemic (world-wide) flu fades in the mildest flu season on record, and governments are left sitting on millions of dollars of stocks of vaccines. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe will begin an official investigation into evidence of scandalous corruption relationships in the new “Golden Triangle” of the global drugs industry—WHO (World Health Organization) [H: “Golden Triangle” is the illegal drug trade out of Southeast Asia—Vietnam—that is COMPLETELY RUN BY YOUR CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. Mel Gibson and Danny Glover’s “Lethal Weapon” motion picture and “Bo” Gritz’s book “Called To Serve” spell it out for you.]—it’s scientific academic ‘advisors’ of SAGE, and the pharma drugs industry, yet new confirmations of the extent of official corruption are emerging.
Further information on official WHO corruption has emerged as people begin to look more closely at the unelected officials wielding so much power over our health.
According to WHO’s official declaration on conflicts of interest, its official scientific advisory body, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE), are obliged to inform on all kinds of financial research support, scholarships, and payment for collaboration and sponsor support for the research unit during the past three years.
Now, despite a WHO pledge of transparency in publishing the ties of its members or advisors to the pharma(ceutical) industry, a Danish Freedom of Information Act request by Louise Voller & Kristian Villesen for the Danish daily newspaper Information has confirmed that the newest member of the elite SAGE, Finnish Professor Juhani Eskola, an advisor, managed not to reveal the fact that his Finnish research laboratory, THL, a WHO research center, got 6.3 million euros (about $9 million) from swine flu vaccine maker, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) in 2009. GSK produces the H1N1 Swine flu vaccine, ‘Pandemrix’, which the Finnish and many other governments, following the recommendations of THL and WHO, purchased in large volumes as a national pandemic reserve.
The Finnish Minister of Health has become involved in the Eskola case and has asked for transparency concerning the researcher’s financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. However, Professor Eskola doesn’t agree that there is a problem. He secures and protects his ‘WHO’ status by offering a minor ‘consultative payment’ to the pharmaceutical company, Novartis.
The GSK money is the THL lab’s largest income source. Questioned about the obvious conflict of interest in the appointment of Eskola to “objectively” advise WHO on vaccines, Eskola admits, “We are aware that there appears to be a conflict of interest.”
‘Mr. Flu’ and the Stench of Corruption
Eskola is part of a much more pervasive corruption in the scientific advisors of WHO. The scientist perhaps most influential in the vaccine decisions of WHO since the outbreak of SARS in Asia and of Avian Flu several years ago is Holland’s Professor Albert Osterhaus. Known as ‘Mr. Flu’ for his enormous influence over WHO and other flu decisions, Osterhaus lost his shine recently when the Dutch Parliament was forced to investigate Osterhaus’ ties to the pharma industry.
Osterhaus, of the Erasmus University in Rotterdam, Holland, has been named by Dutch media researchers as the person at the center of the worldwide Swine Flu H1N1 Influenza A 2009 pandemic hysteria. Not only is Osterhaus the connecting person in an international network that has been described as the Pharma Mafia, he is THE key advisor to WHO on influenza and is intimately positioned to personally profit from the billions of euros in vaccine allegedly aimed at H1N1.
Osterhaus’s credentials and expertise in his field were not in question. What is in question, according to a short report published by the journal Science, are his links to corporate interests that stand to potentially profit from the swine flu pandemic. Science carried the following brief note in its October 16, 2009, issue about Osterhaus:
“For the past 6 months, one could barely switch on the television in the Netherlands without seeing the face of famed virus hunter Albert Osterhaus talking about the swine flu pandemic. Or so it has seemed. Osterhaus, who runs an internationally renowned virus lab at Erasmus Medical Center, has been Mr. Flu. Last week, his reputation took a nosedive after it was alleged that he has been stoking pandemic fears to promote his own business interests in vaccine development. As Science went to press, the Dutch House of Representatives had even slated an emergency debate about the matter.”
Albert Osterhaus is no small player. He stands at the global nexus of every major virus panic of the past decade, from the mysterious SARS deaths in Hong Kong, where current WHO Director Margaret Chan got her start in her career as a local health official. According to his official bio at the European Commission, Osterhaus was engaged in April 2003 at the height of the panic over SARS (Severe Acquired Respiratory Syndrome) in investigation of the Hong Kong outbreak of respiratory illnesses. The EU report states, “he again showed his skill at moving fast to tackle a serious problem. Within three weeks, he had proved that the disease was caused by a newly discovered corona virus that resides in civet cats, other carnivorous animals, or bats.”
Then Osterhaus moved on as SARS cases vanished from view, this time publicizing dangers of what he claimed was H5N1 Avian Flu. [H: The H5N1 “Bird Flu” has just been announced to have been ENGINEERED TO BE A LEVEL 4 BIOLOGICAL AGENT—BY YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT SCIENTISTS! That means MILITARY GRADE BIO-WEAPONS-GRADE, CHELAS! That is against U.S. law for it is a “TREAT ASSESSMENT” operation that deliberately modified the existing H5N1 virus TO BE MORE TRANSMISSIBLE TO HUMANS”!] They said that, if this “Bio-weapon” is accidentally released to the population, it will be a pandemic disaster. Government whistleblowers have sounded the alarm on a group of individuals who did this with the intent to kill great numbers of civilians as a means of depopulation. [H: You now have all the pieces in place to spread the plagues that Biblical Prophecies have foretold for these so-called “Last Days” of Armageddon. Remember, it will be man—NOT GOD—who will bring these horrors onto you-the-people! Shout the truth to all who will have ears to listen and eyes to see, for it is your very survival as a species of human beings that is at stake! Knowledge of who the evil criminals are (THE ZIONISTS) and what they plan to do is your saving grace. YOU have to be your own saviors, precious ones; God and His Hosts cannot do it for you. But we can assist, and the light of The Father is all you need. No evil can stand against that light.] In 1997 he had already begun sounding the alarm following the death in Hong Kong of a three-year-old who Osterhaus learned had had direct contact with birds. Osterhaus went into high gear lobbying across Holland and Europe, claiming that a deadly new mutation of avian flu had jumped to humans and that drastic measures were required. He claimed to be the first scientist in the world to show that H5N1 could be transferred into humans.
In a BBC interview in October 2005 on the danger of Avian Flu, Osterhaus declared, “if the virus manages indeed to, to mutate itself in such a way that it can transmit from human to human, then we have a completely different situation; we might be at the start of the pandemic.” He added, “there is a real chance that this virus could be trafficked by the birds all the way to Europe. There is a real risk, but nobody can estimate the risk at this moment because we haven’t done the experiments,” presumably for a hefty fee.
To bolster his frightening pandemic scenario, Osterhaus and his lab assistants in Rotterdam began assiduously assembling and freezing samples of, well, bird shit, in an attempt to build a more scientific argument. He claimed that at certain times of the year up to 30% of all European birds acted as carriers of the deadly avian virus, H5N1. He also claimed that farmers working with hens and chickens were then exposed. Osterhaus briefed journalists, who dutifully noted his alarm. Politicians were alerted. He wrote papers proposing that the far away deaths in Asia from what he termed H5N1 were coming to Europe, presumably on the wings or in the innards of deadly sick infected birds. [H: Or spread INTENTIONALLY by British Intelligence and Israeli (Khazarian) Mossad (Israeli Intelligence—a murderous bunch of Satanic terrorists!) operatives. A very well made and entertaining James Bond film that is more realistic and factual than all the rest is “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service”. The motion picture produced after Sean Connery appeared in his last official role as Ian Fleming’s master spy (“Never Say Never”) was not by EON Productions and could not use the 007 theme song. In it Telly Savalas played Ernst Stavro Blofield—another Jewish Bond supervillain, though Savalas himself was Greek—who tries to spread pandemic viruses all over the world using ten beautiful girls he places under hypnosis. Bond foils the plot with the help of his future father-in-law, the top “mafia” man in all of Europe, and a handful of loyal mob “hitman” who end up as best men at Bond’s wedding. Which shows the merging of British Intelligence (MI-6 or Military Intelligence Division Six) and Europe’s Mafia, just as in America your Central Intelligence Agency was merged with the Italian Mafia. Again I repeat, those Ian Fleming spy “novels” are based on real assignments from MI-6 files, changed and embellished a little so Fleming wouldn’t himself get “bumped off”.] He claimed that migratory birds were carrying the deadly new disease as far west as Germany’s Baltic island, Rügen, Croatia and Ukraine. He conveniently ignored the fact the birds do not migrate east to west but rather north to south. [H: Emphases added.]
Osterhaus’ Avian Flu alarm campaign really took off in 2003 when a Dutch veterinary doctor became ill and died. Osterhaus claimed the death was from H5N1. He convinced the Dutch government to order slaughter of millions of chickens. Yet no other infected persons died from the alleged H5N1. Osterhaus claimed that that was simply proof of the effectiveness of the preemptive slaughter campaign.
Osterhaus claimed that bird feces were the source, via air bombardment or droppings, onto populations and birds below. That was the vehicle for the spread of the deadly new Asian strain of H5N1, he insisted.
There was only one problem with the now voluminous frozen samples of diverse bird excrement he and his associates had collected and frozen at his institute. There was not one single confirmed example of H5N1 virus found in any of his samples. At a May 2006 Congress of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), Osterhaus and his Erasmus colleagues were forced to admit that, in testing 100,000 samples of their assiduously saved bird feces, they had discovered not one single case of H5N1 virus.
At a WHO conference in Verona in 2008 titled “Avian influenza at the Human-Animal Interface” in a presentation to scientific colleagues undoubtedly less impressed by appeals to pandemic emotion than the non-scientific public, Osterhaus admitted that “A proper risk assessment of H5N1 as the cause of a new pandemic cannot be made with the currently available information.” By then, however, his sights were already firmly on other possible pandemic triggers to focus his vaccination activities. A Mexican outbreak of a strange disease rapidly became swine flu, the now-famous H1N1 Influenza A of 2009, and ‘Mr. Flu’ was once more at the forefront, sounding the alarm at WHO.
Tip of a Big, Big Iceberg
The financial ties of Eskola and Osterhaus to the pharma industry that stands to gain from their scientific recommendations to WHO is but the tip of a big, big iceberg.
The following list of WHO researchers names more scientists reported to have financial ties to Big Pharma, suggesting the entire WHO system is systematically corrupt:
· Dr. Peter Figueroa, Professor in the Department of Community Health and Psychiatry in Jamaica, has received money from Merck.
· Dr. Neil Ferguson has received funding from Baxter, GlaxoSmithKline, and Roche, as well as from some insurance companies.
· Professor Malik Peiris in Hong King has received money from Baxter, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi Pasteur.
· Dr. Arnold Monto, advisor to Chiron, GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, Roche, Novartis, Baxter, and Sanofi Pasteur, has received funding from same.
· Dr. Friedrich Hayden, consultant to MedImmune and Sanofi Pasteur, received money from those companies, in addition to Roche, RW Johnson, and Smith Kline Beecham.
· ‘Dr. Flu’ Prof. Albert Osterhaus has received money from Baxter, Crucell, Novartis, Hoffman-La Roche, MedImmune, Nobilon, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD, GlaxoSmithKline, and Solvay.
The WHO is in the powerful position of reviewing and making vaccine recommendations to the world.
Changing the Definition of Pandemic
In an interview with Der Spiegel magazine in Germany, epidemiologist Dr. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration, an organization of independent scientists evaluating all flu-related studies, noted the implications of the privatization of WHO and the commercialization of health:
Jefferson: “One of the extraordinary features of this influenza—and the whole influenza saga—is that there are some people who make predictions year after year, and they get worse and worse. None of them so far have come about, and these people are still there making these predictions. For example, what happened with the bird flu which was supposed to kill us all? Nothing. But that doesn’t stop these people from always making their predictions. Sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole industry almost waiting for a pandemic to occur.
SPIEGEL: Who do you mean? The World Health Organization (WHO)?
Jefferson: The WHO and public health officials, virologists, and the pharmaceutical companies. They’ve built this machine around the impending pandemic. And there’s a lot of money involved, and influence, and careers, and entire institutions! And all it took was one of these influenza viruses to mutate to start the machine grinding ….
When asked if the WHO had deliberately declared the Pandemic Emergency in order to create a huge market for H1N1 vaccines and drugs, Jefferson replied,
“Don’t you think there’s something noteworthy about the fact that the WHO has changed its definition of pandemic? The old definition was a new virus, which went around quickly, for which you didn’t have immunity, and which created a high morbidity and mortality rate. Now the last two have been dropped, and that’s how swine flu has been categorized as pandemic.”
Conveniently enough, the WHO published the new Pandemic definition in April 2009 just in time to allow WHO, on advice of SAGE and others like Albert “Dr Flu” Osterhaus and David Salisbury, to declare the mild cases of flu dubbed H1N1 Influenza A to be declared Pandemic Emergency.
Pandemic declaration automatically activates countless national emergency preparations, including mandatory stockpiling of vaccines, vaccines supplied, of course, by the same pharmaceutical companies pouring money into the advisors of WHO. For them the new “Golden Triangle” is perhaps even more lucrative than the Asian Golden Triangle of drugs in the 1960’s Vietnam War era. And so far it’s all legal, to boot.
Endnotes
Louise Voller & Kristian Villesen, WHO Advisor Conceals a Donation of Millions from a Pharmaceutical Company, Dagbladet Information, Copenhagen, 10 December, 2009, accessed [online] at theflucase.
Martin Enserink, In Holland, the Public Face of Flu Takes a Hit, Science, 16 October 2009: Vol. 326. No. 5951, pp. 350, 351; DOI: 10.1126/science.326_350b.
European Commission, “Research”, Dr Albert Osterhaus, accessed [online] at ec.europa.eu.
Jane Corbin, Interview with Dr Albert Osterhaus, BBC Panorama, 4 October, 2005.
Karin Steinberger, Vogelgrippe: Der Mann mit der Vogelperspektive, Sueddeutsche Zeitung, 20 October, 2005, accessed [online] at sueddeutsche.de.
Schweinegrippe-Geldgieriger Psychopath Auslöser der Pandemie? accessed [online] at polskaweb.eu.
Ab Osterhaus, External factors influencing H5N1 mutation/reassortment events with pandemic potential, OIE, 7-9 October 2008, Verona, Italy, accessed [online] at www.oie.
Tom Jefferson, Interview with Epidemiologist Tom Jefferson: ‘A Whole Industry Is Waiting For A Pandemic,’ Der Spiegel, 21 July, 2009, accessed [online] at spiegel.de.
Louise Voller, Kristian Villesen, Mystisk [aendring] af WHO’s definition af en pandemi, Copenhagen Information, 15 November 2009, accessed [online] at information.dk.
_________________________
Nine Questions That Stump Every Pro-Vaccine Advocate
David Nihalovic, ND
October 28, 2009
Since the flu pandemic was declared, there have been several so-called “vaccine experts” coming out of the woodwork, attempting to justify the effectiveness of vaccines. All of them parrot the same ridiculous historical and pseudoscientific perspectives of vaccinations, which are easily squelched with the following nine questions.
Claim: The study of vaccines, their historical record of achievements, effectiveness, safety and mechanism in humans, are well understood and proven in scientific and medical circles.
Fact: The claim is completely false.
1. What to ask: Could you please provide one double-blind, placebo-controlled study that can prove the safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
2. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence on ANY study which can confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
3. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence which can prove that disease reduction in any part of the world, at any point in history, was attributable to inoculation of populations?
4. What to ask: Could you please explain how the safety and mechanism of vaccines in the human body are scientifically proven if their pharmacokinetics (the study of bodily absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of ingredients) are never examined or analyzed in any vaccine study?
One of the most critical elements which defines the toxicity potential of any vaccine is its pharmacokinetic properties. Drug companies and health agencies refuse to consider the study, analysis, or evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of any vaccine.
There is not one double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the history of vaccine development that has ever proven their safety, effectiveness, or achievements.
There are also no controlled studies completed in any country which have objectively proven that vaccines have any direct or consequential effect on the reduction of any type of disease in any part of the world.
Every single study that has ever attempted to validate the safety and effectiveness of vaccines has conclusively established carcinogenic, mutagenic, neurotoxic, or fertility impairments, but they won’t address those.
Claim: Preservatives and chemical additives used in the manufacture of vaccines are safe, and no studies have been linked or proven them unsafe for use in humans.
Fact: The claim is completely false.
5. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as to how injecting a human being with a confirmed neurotoxin is beneficial to human health and prevents disease?
6. What to ask: Can you provide a risk/benefit profile on how the benefits of injecting a known neurotoxin exceed its risks to human health for the intended goal of preventing disease.
This issue is no longer even open to debate. It is a scientifically established fact in literally hundreds of studies that the preservatives and chemical additives in vaccines damage cells. Neurotoxicity, immune suppression, immune-mediated chronic inflammation, and carcinogenic proliferation are just a few of several effects that have been observed on the human body. Consult a list of chemicals in vaccines.
Fortunately, the drug companies still tell us the damage vaccines have on the human body. People just don’t read them. All you have to do is look at the insert for any vaccine, and it will detail the exact ingredients, alerts and potentially lethal effects. See my latest analysis of the Arepanrix H1N1 vaccine for an example.
Any medical professional who believes that it is justified to inject any type of neurotoxin [H: Artificial sweeteners such as “Nutra Sweet” are neurotoxins, too] into any person to prevent any disease is completely misguided, misinformed, deluded, and ignorant of any logic regarding human health.
Claim: Once an individual is injected with the foreign antigen in the vaccine, that individual becomes immune to future infections.
Fact: The claim is completely false.
7. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on how bypassing the respiratory tract (or mucous membrane) is advantageous and how directly injecting viruses into the body enhances immune functioning and prevents future infections?
8. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on how a vaccine would prevent viruses from mutating?
9. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as to how a vaccination can target a virus in an infected individual who does not have the exact viral configuration or strain the vaccine was developed for?
All promoters of vaccination fail to realize that the respiratory tract of humans (actually all mammals) contains antibodies which initiate natural immune responses within the respiratory tract mucosa. Bypassing this mucosal aspect of the immune system by directly injecting viruses into the body leads to a corruption in the immune system itself. As a result, the pathogenic viruses (or bacteria) cannot be eliminated by the immune system and remain in the body, where they will further grow and/or mutate as the individual is exposed to ever more antigens and toxins in the environment which continue to assault the immune system.
Despite the injection of any type of vaccine, viruses continue circulating through the body, mutating and transforming into other organisms. The ability of a vaccine manufacturer to target the exact viral strain without knowing its mutagenic properties is equivalent to shooting a gun at a fixed target that has already been moved from its location. You would be shooting at what was, not what is!
Flu viruses may mutate, change, or adapt several times over a period of one flu season, making the seasonal influenza vaccine 100% redundant and ineffective every single flu season. Ironically, the natural immune defenses of the human body can target these changes, but the vaccine cannot. [H: Do you see? Your Zionist adversary has set up a systematic WORLD-WIDE thrust to kill off your Earth/Shan’s human population, so they can have the world to themselves, in the name of the Anti-Christ/Anti-God. The genocidal vaccines have “switched off” your body’s own defense mechanisms. It used to be that one could shrug off a cold or an infection of any kind. Now if you get the sniffles, it very may well be a death sentence! The pharmaceutical drug houses are JEWISH KHAZARIAN poison factories for use against you Christians. As you can see from your “holiday” celebrations, Jesus “Christ” and “Christ-mass” are no longer allowed to be mentioned on the radio or television now. However, the Hanukah candles and the Star of David are everywhere. Even disguised as snowflakes on the Jewish TV “holiday” ads, the SIX-POINTED STAR: Is everywhere!
(Illustration: Two triangles, one inverted, on top of each other.)
Yet, Christians can no longer pray in Christian schools (which are your public schools since your nation is founded as a CHRISTIAN NATION under God), nor can the 10 COMMANDMENTS be displayed in courthouses or other public buildings. This JOURNAL focuses on freeing the body from the limits which disease and vaccines impose on man’s psyche. How can you look at yourselves as Godly and spiritual beings if everyone around you is sick and dying???! Know that that isn’t God Aton’s plan—THAT IS MAN’S PLAN FOISTED OFF ON YOU-THE-PEOPLE AS “DIVINE RETRIBUTION”!]
I have never encountered one pro-vaccine advocate, whether medically or scientifically qualified, who could answer even one, let alone all nine of these questions. One or all of the following will happen when debating any of the above questions:
· They will concede defeat and admit they are stumped.
· They will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not pertain to the question.
· They will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical arguments and scientific studies which have been disproved over and over again. Not one pro-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these questions in an open mainstream venue.
Dave Mihalovic is a naturopathic medical doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention, and a natural approach to treatment. [End quoting.]
Jonur, break here, please. Hatonn moving to standby. Salu
